Laserfiche WebLink
obi 401L0 Y7. 306P <br /> Discussion Points Regarding Traffic Signal on Highway 10 and Edgewood Drive,Mounds View <br /> Chuck Whiting,Mounds View City Administrator,April 30, 1998 <br /> 1. Theater development discussions started in September of 1996. Original concepts were for one exit onto <br /> Highway 10. Meetings to this affect were held with adjoining neighborhoods. While lengthy,general acceptance <br /> of the project under this understanding lessened the concerns for traffic among residents of Mounds View Drive. <br /> 2. February of 1997 saw the discussions start of the"ring road"concept with the University of Minnesota. The <br /> concept was part of a general planning discussion conducted by the U of M with several communities. The <br /> concept was well received in Mounds View,first,as a precursor to upcoming comprehensive plan process,and <br /> second,as an attempt to respond as a possible solution to growing resident concerns about traffic problems within <br /> the city. <br /> 3. Staff recognized the possibility of tying the ring road concept with the theater development, something that <br /> could only happen with the acquiescence of the developer first, and support eventually from MNDOT. This is <br /> where our discussions with MNDOT started and the ring road idea was well received. <br /> 4. Ring road idea led to practical concerns that needed to be addressed. First, as an idea specific to this site at <br /> this time,there was no supporting basis in the city's comprehensive plan yet to mandate action premised on the <br /> concept. Development questions rising from the north side of Highway 10 led to public hearings on the concept <br /> in October of 1997. <br /> 5.Mounds View Drive residents regained their interest in the theater development at this time as they now saw <br /> an exit onto Long Lake Road. Residents first,then city staff,contacted MNDOT to determine whether a project <br /> could proceed without the exit to Long Lake Road. Conversations and correspondence indicated it could,or at <br /> least was interpreted as such. The developer,waiting for the city to determine an acceptable course of action <br /> proceeded to redraw plans to no longer have the exit onto Long Lake Road. <br /> 6. This plan was submitted to the City Planning Commission in March and was approved after two Commission <br /> meetings on April 15. Plan was reviewed by MNDOT April 21 where City was told the ring road or Long Lake <br /> Road exit had to be part of the project. City Council approved the plan as submitted April 27 due to concern that <br /> revising the project would lead to procedural delays that the developer would no longer agree to. Resident <br /> concern clearly turned against the project in its entirety, much due in part to the traffic concerns of exits on <br /> County Road H2 or Long Lake Road. Council authorized staff and the mayor to meet with MNDOT staff. <br /> Summary: <br /> While the ring road idea was incorporated into this site development,it has not been incorporated into any city <br /> comprehensive planning process because that process has not been completed. Other alternatives for a ring road <br /> concept do exist,but for the city to delay action on this project in order for that work to be completed simply <br /> jeopardizes the project. The City therefore must turn to MNDOT to seek a remedy to the situation. <br />