Laserfiche WebLink
APPROVED <br /> Page 9 <br /> May 11, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Dan Johnson,7359 Park View Terrace,noted that within one block of the theater project,there are deaf <br /> and blind residents. With the steady increase in traffic on County Road H-2,he has concerns in the safety <br /> of these children and asked the Council to consider this when voting on this issue. <br /> Al Gregerson,7366 Park View Terrace,asked where the cars exiting onto H-2 will go. Also,there will <br /> also be an increase in pedestrian traffic. If the stop sign remains at County Road H-2 and Long Lake and <br /> there are 50 cars turning onto Highway 10,it will cause a backup. He believes there will be a greater <br /> traffic impact than what is predicted. <br /> Tracy Swig,5292 Edgewood Drive, stated she would like to invite the mayor to come to her home from <br /> 2:00 to 4:30 p.m. and see the number of students walking along Edgewood. She believes these are safety <br /> concerns that the Council needs to look at. <br /> Kelly Rosenthal,2425 Ridge Lane,stated prior to Thursday's meeting,the residents on her street were not <br /> informed of the meetings on this development. She stated she cannot understand how the traffic consultant <br /> estimated an additional 50 cars per hour on County Road H-2. <br /> Mr.Jopke explained that the traffic engineer predicted that the vast majority of the patrons will use the <br /> Highway 10 entrance. The peak hours are 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. <br /> Mayor McCarty noted that residents within a designated distance of the proposed development are notified <br /> in writing of the Public Hearings in regard to the project. Additionally,the Public Hearings are published <br /> in the local newspapers. <br /> Council member Stigney stated that he has taken the entire community into consideration in his stand on <br /> this issue. Additionally,he plans to listen to the residents,as he promised. The cost of the re-alignment of <br /> Edgewood should be covered by the developer. He would like the Council to consider a 50/50 split on the <br /> costs between the city and the developer. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn to Amend the motion to state that 50%of the cost of the re-alignment <br /> of Edgewood and the signalized intersection and associated costs be paid for by the developer. <br /> VOTE: 2 ayes 3 nays(McCarty/Koopmeiners/Quick) Motion Fails <br /> MOTION by Stigney to table any action on Resolution No. 5226 until after the pending petition is <br /> resolved. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br /> VOTE ON AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 5226: <br /> 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried <br /> Mayor McCarty recessed the meeting. <br /> The meeting was reconvened at 9:25 p.m. <br />