Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 APPROVED <br /> April 27, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.615,an Ordinance <br /> Vacating a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement over and across Lots 2 and 3,North Star Industrial <br /> Park 2nd Addition,and to waive the reading. <br /> VOTE: <br /> Council member Stigney aye <br /> Council member Koopmeiners aye <br /> Council member Quick aye <br /> Mayor McCarty aye <br /> Motion Carries(4-0). <br /> Mayor McCarty noted that the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 615 will be held on May 11, 1998. <br /> D. 7:20 p.m.Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5219,a Resolution Approving a <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 <br /> Eastwood Road,Changing the Land Use Designations from Low and High Density Residential to <br /> Neighborhood Commercial,Requested by TOLD Development Company. <br /> AND <br /> E. 7:20 p.m. Public Hearing and Introduction of Ordinance No.614 an Ordinance to Re-zone <br /> Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood road from R-3,Medium Density <br /> Residential and R-1,Single Family Residential,to B-2,Limited Business Districted,Requested by <br /> TOLD Development Company. <br /> Mr.Ericson asked that Items D and E be considered together as they relate to the same project. <br /> He explained that the Planning Commission voted to approve the Resolution to amend the Comprehensive <br /> Plan and also to approve the rezoning of the property. The applicant has requested continuance of these <br /> items for two weeks until the next regular Council meeting. <br /> Attorney Long explained that under the State Statutes, approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment <br /> requires a 2/3 vote of the council(in this case,four members of the council to approve). Under state <br /> statutes regarding zoning amendments,approval requires a 4/5 vote(all four council members present). <br /> MOTION by Mayor McCarty to deny the request for a continuance. Notices have gone out to the public <br /> and many residents have taken the time to come to the council meeting(noting the full council chambers). <br /> MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to grant the request for a continuance of Items 5 (D)and(E). <br /> Attorney Long noted if the continuance is granted and the Public Hearing is continued,a date must be <br /> specified in the motion so that the public is made aware. This will also alleviate the necessity to re- <br /> publicize the public hearing notice. <br />