Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 APPROVED <br /> April 27, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: <br /> Quick/Stigney to continue the Public Hearing on May 11, 1998. <br /> VOTE: 2 ayes 2 nays(Koopmeiners/McCarty) Motion Fails <br /> Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:42 p.m. <br /> Carol Arel,7750 Greenwood Drive,presented a petition containing almost 200 signatures in opposition to <br /> the project and to the re-zoning of residential property for commercial use. She noted that there will be <br /> many residents affected by the rezoning of the property by an increase in traffic,safety concerns and <br /> property value issues. She noted that the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City <br /> Council based on what they"think"the new comprehensive plan will include in part. She personally <br /> spoke with Dick Thompson at Metropolitan Council and he indicated that the Planning Commission is not <br /> allowed to consider in this decision what the new comprehensive plan might be. The amendment request <br /> therefore needs to be considered based on the current comprehensive plan. She has read the city's current <br /> comprehensive plan and it states that residential development is and will continue to be the primary type of <br /> land use development within the community and that low density,single family neighborhoods are to be <br /> preserved. She does not feel that a development of this type is a preservation of residential areas. Ms. <br /> Arel noted goals contained in the comprehensive plan which she feels are in direct opposition to this type <br /> of development. In regard to traffic,the only traffic study that they have seen to date,indicates a 40% <br /> increase in traffic daily on Greenwood Drive to over 750 cars. Critical portions of this project have fallen <br /> apart and she wonders why it has continued. <br /> Other concerns expressed by Ms.Arel included the possibility of a 24-hour pharmacy at Wallgreens, the <br /> fact that the project size is less than five acres(city code 1120.03)which is in direct violation of code,the <br /> proposal does not fit into the current code requirements,and that many residents did not receive copies of <br /> the notice of Public Hearing. She also stated a concern about developers trying to pressure residents into <br /> supporting the project. She asked that the Council consider what is best for the residents of Mounds <br /> View. <br /> Kathy Piche',2204 Lois Drive,stated that for some residents their dream homes are being changed by this <br /> development. She personally will not be directly affected however she has concerns as it very well could <br /> be her neighborhood. She asked that the Council consider leaving the residential neighborhoods as they <br /> are and to continue to provide the sense of privacy and security that each citizen deserves. <br /> Janet Wilcox,7815 Eastwood Road,noted that the developer of the townhome project in the area has <br /> shown some interest in this particular parcel of land. She is concerned that he may come in with a proposal <br /> for the corner if this development is not approved. Residents feel they basically have a choice between a <br /> drugstore at the end of the street or more townhomes. She feels this may be why the Council has not heard <br /> from very many residents on Eastwood. The proposal does not paint Mounds View as a family-friendly <br /> place. <br /> Jodi Johnson,7870 Greenwood Drive,stated she is appalled at how the council and staff have been <br /> working with this development plan. Residents have indicated their opposition since the beginning and <br /> she feels proceeding with the project is a blatant disregard for the residents'feelings. <br />