My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-1998 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
07-27-1998 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:14 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 6:29:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/27/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/27/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
410 Page 4 <br /> July 13, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> down some uniform rule of law and not administrative of administerial acts, which Resolution <br /> 5251 falls under. The State Statutes in Minnesota, Section 410.20, provides cities with the <br /> authority to create city charters and also provides for the powers of initiative referendum recall. <br /> The language in that statute that authorizes charter cities to create charters and to create those <br /> powers only applies to ordinances. <br /> The City Attorney's opinion was restated as being: A resolution initiative would not be valid if <br /> put before the voters. This would subject the City to the accusation that they were <br /> misappropriating public funds. <br /> Quick added that the theater developers could in turn sue the City for breach of contract. <br /> Stigney pointed out that Mounds Views City Charter states that the law applies to both <br /> ordinances and resolutions. He added he didn't think the citizens of the City should have to force <br /> their own City to do something. <br /> Julie Olson, 2663 Lake Court Circle, requested that the City Council call for a special election <br /> • for a referendum on the issue of allowing theater access on to the City's residential streets. <br /> Gunn stated that she had had citizens state to her that their names were on the petitions because <br /> of misrepresentation of facts. She asked if the names could be taken off of the petition once they <br /> have been submitted. <br /> Whiting stated the people should contact the City Clerk in this regard and their names would be <br /> removed from the petition. <br /> Attorney Long stated that the time to withdraw names from the petition had expired according to <br /> Section 5.02 of the City's Charter. <br /> David Janke suggested that the City's Charter be changed, remove the word resolution, to reflect <br /> the correct language. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to approve Resolution 5251, Concerning Sufficiency of <br /> Corrected Petition for Initiative Regarding the Project Commonly Know as the Theater Project. <br /> Stigney requested that the City comply with the requests of the citizens to hold a special election <br /> to determine whether or not the Theater Project's traffic would be allowed on residential streets. <br /> • Dan Johnson, 7359 Park View Terrace, asked the City Attorney if it was not his (the City <br /> Attorney's) responsibility to advise the citizens, when requested, on matters concerning the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.