Laserfiche WebLink
August 28, 1998 <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br /> Re: August 31, 1998 City Council Budget Work Session <br /> Monday's meeting has been set to continue with work on the 1998 city budget. Council will recall <br /> being briefed on the initial draft budget several weeks ago and identifying some issues of interest <br /> to Council and staff for consideration in 1998. This should continue on Monday evening. <br /> First, a couple of objectives for the meeting should be set. The City will need to set a preliminary <br /> levy at its September 14 meeting. This will set the maximum levy the Council may consider as it <br /> continues with budget work during the fall prior to setting a final budget levy in December. This <br /> preliminary levy will sent to the county for their calculations in the Truth in Taxation notices to be <br /> sent to taxpayers in October notifying them of the City, school and county maximum levies and <br /> budget hearings. The state Department of Revenue sets a maximum levy the City may set. That <br /> amount has been adjusted since staff last reported. In this packet you will note the August 10 revised <br /> notice which for Mounds View set the maximum levy at $1,680,211 or an allowable increase of <br /> 5.02% over the 1998 levy. This is $24,605 more than the maximum levy presented to Council last <br /> month, so there is some more room to work with. The recommendation to Council at this point will <br /> be to set the preliminary levy at this maximum allowable amount September 14 with the <br /> understanding that it can be reduced as the budget gets more fully worked into the fall. <br /> The second objective for Monday night is to more fully explore the interests and priorities of the <br /> Council and delve into the purposes of some of the expenses and revenues. Council is advised to <br /> bring their July 17 Preliminary 1999 Budget packet for the discussion. I have asked department <br /> heads to again attend the meeting for answering questions. Bruce has figured that 1% of the levy <br /> equals about $16,000, so it may be possible to view items in the budget from that comparison <br /> standpoint. <br /> Three issues need further work to understand their impact on the budget. The City's direction in <br /> street reconstruction and assessment policies should be reviewed and will be put on the September <br /> 8 work session. The recent decisions on Spring Lake Road do not have immediate impacts on the <br /> 1999 budget, but depending on the approach to street reconstruction and assessment policies long <br /> term costs and cash flow will likely be effected. In payroll,the Hay evaluation and options can have <br /> an impact on the budget and will also be on that agenda for discussion as well. Right now, 3%has <br /> been added to existing payroll(pre-Hay) for a working number in the budget. This figure is general <br /> and has only three general reasons for being set at 3% ,being the amount established for the second <br /> year of the police contract, a percentage amount equal to 1998's increase and it seems in line with <br /> what other cities have been doing(not knowing what is being proposed generally by other cities for <br /> 1999). It is clear from discussions at the Council that payroll and comparable worth matters illicit <br /> various opinions, but the approach that should pertain for Monday night's discussion is simply <br /> overall payroll expense. Right now, no comparable worth adjustments are delineated in the budget. <br />