Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO September 11, 1998 <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br /> Re: September 14, 1998 City Council Meeting <br /> Despite the heavy work session agenda of last Tuesday,this Monday's meeting is relatively light. <br /> Here's what we have: <br /> Consent Agenda-Item 5F-Extension of Building N Final Plat: Everest has been in contact with <br /> us again on their Building N efforts. This item on the Consent Agenda and the development <br /> agreement on the EDA agenda have come back to the City at Everest's request and have to take into <br /> account some circumstantial changes that have taken place. Rick Jopke's memo reviews the fact that <br /> extending the final plat deadline as requested,while of no real changes from the original, may fall <br /> outside of the code requirements for extensions. I agree that no adverse effect to the city is created <br /> by this extension,but the Council may want to reconsider any extensions after this one. Everest is <br /> attempting to market this project as a development and some changes in the development agreement <br /> allude to this. Regardless,it still appears to be worthwhile to proceed with these changes and allow <br /> Everest to move on Building N. However, continued indefinite inaction on Everest's part in <br /> developing this property may want to be discouraged in the future. <br /> Council Business - Item 7C - Resolution 5265 Setting 1999 Preliminary Levy and Setting <br /> Public Hearing: Bruce has put together the resolution setting the 1999 preliminary levy at the <br /> maximum amount, approximately a 5% increase over 1998, and setting the budget public hearing <br /> for November 30. This will also be a special Council meeting. I am working with staff to address <br /> the Council on the 1999 budget again at the October 5 work session. This meeting will be <br /> particularly timely because it will be the same meeting that the community center management <br /> proposals will be reviewed, and I expect to understand the general fund budget impact of those <br /> proposals as well. <br /> Item 7D-Theater Development Agreement: The language should reflect the discussions of last <br /> Monday evening. I think unless there are major problems with it, the Council should approve it to <br /> allow staff and the engineers to get going on the specifications of the street reconstruction in order <br /> to get the traffic light in as quickly as possible next spring. Hopefully that will help close the timing <br /> gap between the theater opening and the light for traffic management. Also, staff has not pursued <br /> seeking requests for proposals for development of the corner parcel of city property created by the <br /> realignment of Edgewood for a number of reasons. First, the wetland mitigation options on the <br /> community center site were pursued and when it became evident that the Midland Videen property <br /> would not be critical to that mitigation it lessened the need to pursue that property, and hence <br /> proposals for development of the corner. Second,two developers are aware of the new lot and have <br /> chosen not to push the City at this time for whatever reason. Wendell Smith is probably too busy <br /> with developing the theater property, and Terry Moses may be waiting for the City to commit either <br />