Laserfiche WebLink
UNAPPROVED <br /> Page 4 <br /> September 14, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> MR. STIGNEY: No, let's -- Can we clear up this issue? Or is just going to fall into the <br /> void? <br /> MR. KOOPMEINERS: It's cleared up. <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: It's cleared up. We just had a motion and your motion failed. <br /> MR. KOOPMEINERS: Let's get on with the Agenda. <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: Are you done now? <br /> MR. STIGNEY: As long as the public-- <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: Are you done now? <br /> MR. STIGNEY: No, not quite. Can I speak? Or do I have any 1st Amendment rights at <br /> all? <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: Yes. If you have a motion, you can speak. <br /> MR. STIGNEY: I am speaking -- <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: Do you want to hear the section on Robert's Rules that says you <br /> must have a motion? <br /> MR. STIGNEY: You said I could comment on the rule that you read of Roberts Rules. <br /> May I comment on it. <br /> MAYOR McCARTY: Sure. <br /> MR. STIGNEY: The motion that I made had a definite time frame established. It was to <br /> be in conjunction with the Hay Study, as it shows on Page 2, fifth sentence from the <br /> top(referring to the August 24, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes). "The motion was <br /> made to table in conjunction with the Hay Study, so a definite time period was stated." <br /> As a matter of fact, we had the work session on September 8, in conjunction with the Hay <br /> Study. So this time frame was there. It has also been a procedural policy of this Council, <br /> since I've been on it, any time I've made a motion to postpone something it was changed <br /> by the Council or by, specifically you,the Chair,to a table to a definite date. So,this is <br /> just policy, something procedurally that we have. Now, you can pull whatever you want <br />