Laserfiche WebLink
470 Pillsbury Center <br /> Kennedy 200 South Sixth Street <br /> Minneapolis MN 55402 <br /> sL Graven (612) 337-9300 telephone <br /> (612):337-9310 fax <br /> e-mill:attys@kennedy-graven.com <br /> CHARTERED <br /> JOHN M. LEFEVRE,JR. <br /> Attorney at Law <br /> Direct Dial(612)337-9218 <br /> December 3, 1997 BY FAX & U.S. MAIL <br /> Lynnette Morgan <br /> Assistant to the City Administrator <br /> City of Mounds View <br /> 2401 Highway 10 <br /> Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 <br /> RE: Personnel Issues <br /> MU210-18 <br /> Dear Ms. Morgan: <br /> • 7 <br /> Although we have not completely our review of the proposed personnel handbook as yet, I <br /> wanted to let you know of the certain policy issues which are appropriate for discussion by the <br /> council as they consider adoption of revised personnel policies. <br /> 1. At Will Employment v. Termination for Cause: In the introduction to the handbook, the <br /> description states that just as employees are free to terminate employment with the city <br /> at any time for any reason, the city remains free to terminate employment at any time for <br /> any reason not prohibited by law. This would describe the concept known as <br /> "Employment At-Will" which would also mean that there is no property right in continued <br /> employment with the city. <br /> However, at Section 1.10 dealing with Discipline, the standard for any discipline appears <br /> to be "just cause." This suggests that just cause as defined is required to be the basis for <br /> discipline up to and including termination. This is a relatively common employment <br /> policy, especially in the context of union contracts, but is not required as a matter of <br /> • employment law. <br /> I would also note that the Section 4.05 on discharge uses a "just cause" standard which <br /> is inconsistent with employment at-will. <br /> • The point is that the city needs to consider which of these two policies it wishes to adopt: <br /> that is, employment at will, or termination for cause. They are essentially inconsistent. <br /> Once this policy decision is made, then the handbook can be revised accordingly. <br /> JML134457 <br /> M13210-18 <br />