Laserfiche WebLink
• MEMO January 9, 1998 <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br /> Re: January 12, 1998 City Council Meeting <br /> Another interesting week in Mounds View. Here's what's on the agenda for Monday. <br /> Item 4- Special Order of Business:Both items are to recognize Cathy and Lynette's work with the <br /> City. A reminder that a reception for Cathy will be held starting at 6 p.m. Monday evening. Lynnette <br /> will not be able to attend the meeting. <br /> Item 7C-Resolution No.5206 Re: Anthony Properties and Highway 10 Traffic Light: Wendell <br /> Smith has asked for something of support he can forward to his investing group regarding the City's <br /> position on assisting with the traffic light for the theater project. I wrote the enclosed resolution <br /> attempting to convey the City's interest but also recognizing the City has some issues that need to <br /> be worked to finality first. I certainly have sensed an interest in having this project go ahead, but we <br /> have not gotten to final costs and locations of the work needed. I am also trying to keep in mind that <br /> once discussions start regarding the north side of Highway 10, that any cost incurred in placing the <br /> light and realigning Edgewood Drive should be considering in the City's part of the equation. I think <br /> it is appropriate in this format to convey the interest to Mr. Smith if this will get him going on <br /> submitting plans. I also think the funding sources I refer to in the resolution should be the preferred <br /> funds for any City participation at this time. MNDOT will likely be a source of 50% of the cost, and <br /> the remaining amount may be either TIF or MSA funds. Those costs need to be determined and at - - <br /> this time it would be premature to do anything more than indicate the City's willingness to pursue the <br /> issue. I have asked Mr. Smith to be present Monday to make clear his position. Also, I have just <br /> faxed him the resolution and am waiting for his response to its position. <br /> Item 7D - Job Description for Economic Development Coordinator: At the work session the <br /> Council voiced preference for an economic development coordinator similar to the original position <br /> that was created when Cathy Bennett started. I have enclosed what is basically the original job <br /> description and modified it slightly. Here it answers to the Community Development Director instead <br /> of the City Administrator, and the duties regarding establishing the EDC were changed to do the <br /> work of the EDC. I also did a very quick review of pay level. Without a lot of analysis, the 1996 <br /> level seemed adequate to at least get started in a search. The range from step 1 to step 5 in 1996 was <br /> $36,681.84 to$45,852.36. This should be okay as I say for getting someone with some experience <br /> and ability in working with the business community, and hopefully to keep them here for a while. It <br /> is less than is currently being committing to Cathy although the responsibilities are less. As we move <br /> on with our pay equity analysis, I will likely be asking to utilize some of these budgeted, but now <br /> excess funds to assist in adjustments that may have to be made in other positions, particular those <br /> comparable to this position. What I would ask the Council to approve is the position description and <br /> the pay range. If either is not satisfactory, if some indication as to what is acceptable would be <br /> appreciated. My main concern right now is to advertise to get the position filled in order to carry the <br /> work load that exists right now between myself and Rick Jopke. <br />