My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/02/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/02/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:22 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 6:57:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/9/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/9/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br /> January 12, 1998 APPROVED <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Development. He would like Council feedback on the pay range for the position,noting that he had <br /> provided the council with the pay range schedule from 1996. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the job description for Economic Development <br /> Coordinator and to authorize the Clerk Administrator to proceed with advertising and interviewing <br /> candidates for the position. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> E. Discussion of Other Staffing Options. <br /> Mr.Whiting noted that he had considered a number of options for the Human Resource Technician <br /> position and that a logical consideration would be to hire an Intern. He discussed the various options with <br /> his staff and how the Human Resource Technician position could be modified to an Intern position as it <br /> was several years ago. At some point,this position could be moved into an Assistant position to the <br /> Administrator with Human Resource duties and other city administrative duties. He asked for input <br /> from the council. <br /> Council member Koopmeiners asked if the city had looked into hiring a consulting firm. Mr.Kessel <br /> • stated they had talked with two firms who contacted the city,one of which was a placement firm. The <br /> other firm basically assisted with benefit management. Mr.Kessel did not think that this appears to meet <br /> the city's needs. <br /> A discussion followed. Council member Stigney stated he had questions as to the overall cost and funding <br /> for the position. He wondered if the city should consider a time-share position with another municipality. <br /> Mr. Kessel explained how the position would be funded. Mayor McCarty asked if staff anticipates <br /> exceeding the budget with the new position. Mr.Kessel did not expect that the 1998 budget would be <br /> affected. <br /> Council member Quick stated he is not in favor of considering a time-share position. He does not feel it <br /> would be beneficial to the city. Discussion followed in regard to the State's Pay Equity Standards. Mr. <br /> Kessel noted that changes in the next three years will have an impact on the city's compliance with these <br /> standards. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to authorize the Clerk Administrator to go forward with <br /> defining„advertising and interviewing for this position. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> F. First Reading of Ordinance No.611,An Ordinance Further Amending Cable Franchise <br /> Ordinance 606,Article II,section 4,Franchise Term. <br /> Mr. Whiting explained that last Fall the Council extended the Cable Franchise Agreement. The Cable <br /> Commission is in the process of negotiating the Franchise Agreement and the city is being asked to extend <br /> the original agreement to April 20, 1998 which should give them adequate time to complete the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.