Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 5 <br /> January 26, 1998 APPROVED <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> arose as to whether or not a Wetland Delineation Report was done on the property. According to the <br /> information they have,the property was not in the wetlands,however the Rice Creek Watershed District <br /> maps,however, indicate that the property is in the wetland district. To verify the status,a Wetland <br /> Delineation Report is required. This study cannot be completed until April and therefore the city must <br /> decide if they want to postpone the project until Spring when the report can be completed,or prepare a site <br /> plan for grading and drainage for just the building and the parking in front of the building and not do the <br /> major parking lot where the potentially identified wetland area would be. This would keep the project on <br /> track as far as timing. <br /> Mr. Whiting noted that Resolution No. 5209 is incorrect. The Council should consider making a motion to <br /> enter into a supplemental agreement with WAI Continuum based on the January 20, 1998 letter for <br /> Supplemental Services billed on an hourly rate not to exceed$4,650.00. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to authorize the city to enter into a Supplemental Agreement with WAI <br /> Continuum based on the January 20, 1998 letter for Supplemental Services,billed on an hourly rate not to <br /> exceed$4,650.00. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> • Mr.Olson explained that Resolution No. 5207 would approve the plans and specifications for Phase II of <br /> the project and authorize the taking of bids fore the construction. He noted that the drawings were <br /> submitted on January 20th for staff review. After Council approval,they will be issued on approximately <br /> February 4th for bidding with construction beginning on approximately March 4, 1998. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to approve Resolution No. 5207,A Resolution Approving Phase <br /> II Plans and Specifications and Authorizing the Taking of Bids for the Construction of the Mounds View <br /> Community Center. <br /> Council member Stigney noted that there had been a discussion on the proposed brick at a previous <br /> meeting and it is his understanding that the selected brick will be different than that which is on the City <br /> Hall building. He asked why they are not proposing to use the same brick. <br /> Mr. Olson noted that the smooth surface proposed is easier to clean and that the color will match the brick <br /> on the city hall building. Council member Stigney stated he would prefer to use the same. Other council <br /> members stated they would rather use a brick which is easier to clean. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Mr. Whiting gave the council a brief update on the status of the roof at the community center. He noted <br /> that after a drying period,the roof will be patched to hopefully alleviate any further leakage or damage. <br /> Mr.Koopmeiners suggested that sand be put around the elevated membrane of the roof to help keep water <br /> from the damaged areas. When asked about the roof damage, Mr.Olson stated it is his understanding <br /> that the HVAC units were removed with a crane and therefore,he does not believe they would have <br /> 411 damaged the roof. <br /> F. Review and Approval of Job Description for Administrative Assistant to the City Administrator <br /> Position. <br />