Laserfiche WebLink
SILVERVIEW ESTATES <br /> GENERAL PARTNERSHIP <br /> SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PROJECTION ASSUMPTIONS <br /> FOR THE PERIOD COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 1998 <br /> Ilk AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012 <br /> SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued <br /> Property and Depreciation <br /> Property and equipment are capitalized for income tax purposes . <br /> Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. <br /> The combined property' s Construction Costs are $7 , 133,585 . Finance, <br /> closing costs and other <br /> organization <br /> forecastedare <br /> atprojeted$686c000 ,at $257 ,000 . <br /> Capitalized land improvementsare <br /> The allocation between land, buildings and personal property is <br /> estimated as shown below. <br /> COMBINED PROJECTS <br /> Life Cost <br /> $ 879 , 000 <br /> Land Improvements <br /> Land 15 . 0 years 686 ,000 <br /> Building 27 .5 years 6 , 145,585 <br /> 7 . 0 years 109 ,000 <br /> Personal Property. 30 . 0 years 222, 000 <br /> Finance Costs <br /> Organization Costs 5 . 0 years 35, 000 <br /> 4101Under the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership may recover the cost of <br /> depreciable real property under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery <br /> System (MACRS) . Under MACRS, depreciable residential real property <br /> placed in service after December 31, 1986 may be depreciated over a <br /> 27 . 5-year period using the straight-line method. The Code provides <br /> that depreciation of residential real property over a 27 . 5-year period <br /> and commercial real property over a 39 year period is subject to <br /> adjustment upon audit by the Service . However, the Servicemy <br /> challenge the allocation of the cost between real property, personal <br /> property, and land. A successfulwouldaffect challenge <br /> timingsrtneand ramount of la <br /> for depreciation claimed <br /> Partner' s taxable income or loss . <br /> Depreciation of personal property placed in service after December 31, <br /> 1986 is computed over, a seven-year recovery period using the 200% <br /> declining balance method, switching to the straight-line method to <br /> maximize the deduction. <br /> that <br /> Ih shouldt ion dallowed understates <br /> state law may beadopted <br /> substantR and <br /> be ally lower <br /> the deprecia <br /> than the amounts reflected in the projection. <br /> SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECTION ASSUMPTIONS <br /> The accompanying financial projection assumptions f20o2 the <br /> bapedid <br /> iso <br /> lI commencing January 1, 1998 and ending December 31, <br /> information provided by the General Partner of the Partnership. The <br /> projection is presented on the tax basis of accounting. Accrual <br /> accounting methods have been used in preparing the projections . <br /> ( 3) <br />