Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. O <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Meeting Date: March 2, 1998 <br /> IType of Business: W.K. <br /> WK: Work Session:PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business • <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report • <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I, <br /> . Assessment Policy <br /> Date of Report: February 26, 1998 • <br /> Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms. <br /> Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the <br /> responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that <br /> could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy. <br /> 1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? ✓yes no <br /> 2. What should be revised? )< street percentage assessed <br /> storm sewer assessment water main percentage " <br /> sanitary sewer main percentage <br /> III 3.Street assess % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> Storm sewer$$ 400 350 300 250 200 <br /> Water main% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> Sanitary main% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> 4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets <br /> based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? yes no <br /> 5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual <br /> property assessment? ye 14Qfa.ts cUs-t 40 c;L( '•> <br /> 6. Should (Co. Turnback funds e applied to the specific roads that receive that <br /> designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable <br /> assessments? ,/'yes no <br /> • <br /> 7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of theme /7,4I, <br /> street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? yes no Ilu" e.,4-- 1 <br /> ,, 8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street be <br /> changed? ✓ yes no <br /> 9. Should the City utilize MSA funding and construction standards where <br /> ' designated? yes no <br />"A' 9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? //es no <br /> _____B618 D411 <br />'' 0 10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width, <br /> ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. Yes ono e 4\E" <br /> 11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for �^ <br /> their street'and construct in accordance with the residents requests? '( yes o °I. '2� ;t' <br /> 61"3-"1 1 L 1-" <br /> =-17.- - I f 3. -C-0,-8-s !i ed 40 ro road w4 N-h e. , Q r v ) - o T. <br /> ass4ataPd , KO Lk) da66 , Li �-�, - 01-u\ iy) <br /> nd� <br /> I __ n 1 n,\„ ,-,,..1N t . ,.J .: __ ) > <br />