Agenda Packets - 1998/03/23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

UNAPPROVED Page 7 • March 9, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 Vince Meyer, 8380 Spring Lake Road,stated this project was started 8 months ago and he would like to 2 see it be done this year. However,he would be in favor of a 24 foot wide roadway without curb and 3 gutter. 4 5 Scott Eiser(?),7340 Spring Lake Road,stated there have been three proposals considered by residents 6 already. The residents only want a 24 foot wide roadway,they do not need a sidewalk. 7 8 D. Consideration of Signalization of Xylite and County Road J. 9 10 Mr.Ulrich explained that staff had spoken with Phil Sype of Sysco in regard to the Council's desire to split 11 the expense of the proposed traffic signal with them. Mr. Sype indicated that they would be willing to 12 contribute$5,000 to the construction of the signal. He had also requested that the city pursue the addition 13 of the right turn lane,which staff also felt was wise. John Grey of SEH will be speaking with Anoka 14 County in regard to this. 15 16 Mr. Ulrich went through the estimated cost of this proposed traffic signal,noting that the cost for the City 17 of Mounds View would be roughly$35,000. 18 19 MOTION by Stigney to decline the proposed traffic signal on the basis that Sysco's contribution of$5,000 • 20 it is too small. MOTION FAILS for lack of a second. 21 22 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the city's participation in the signal project as 23 presented(with a$5,000 contribution from Sysco) with the inclusion of a right-turn lane to be funded with 24 MSA funds. .25 26 Mayor McCarty explained that this is for a proposed signal at Lilac Street and County Road(new)J which 27 aligns with the driveway into Sysco. This project cost will be shared by Mounds View,Anoka County, 28 Blaine and Sysco. 29 30 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney Motion Carries 31 32 E. Consideration of Resolution No.5211,Approving and Awarding of Bids for Phase II 33 Construction of the Community Center. 34 35 1. Review of TIF Funding Budgets: Mr.Kessel provided a brief summary of the TIF districts and 36 their cash flow as well as the impact that the expenditures for the Community Center will have on them. 37 38 2. Resolution No.5211 Action: Mr.Dean Olson of WAI explained that they received bids on Phase 39 II of the Community Center Construction on February 24th and that the bids came in on budget as 40 discussed at the last Council meeting. He noted that the construction cost did not include the alternates 41 that the city had asked to be prepared for the bid package. The alternates were discussed with the Task 42 Force and they also felt that the alternates should be included in the project costs. Mr. Olson noted that the 43 bids have been published and are available for review. The total project cost from acquisition to 44 completion is roughly$6.1 million. • 45 46 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney to approve Resolution No. 5211,Approving and Awarding of Bids for 47 Phase II Construction of the Community Center.