Laserfiche WebLink
Storm Drainage <br /> • The originally proposed storm wa 96 <br /> drainage system for the reconstruction of Highway g Y g y included a <br /> regional storm water pond to be constructed adjacent to the northwest shore of Round Lake. <br /> This concept would require trunk sewer along Highway 96 from approximately Keithson Drive <br /> to the proposed ponding site. The conceptual storm drainage plan works for Layout#1, the at- <br /> grade intersection,however significant modifications to the concept plan may need to be made to <br /> accommodate the proposed bridge in Layouts#2, #3 and#4. <br /> In the bridge alternatives, Highway 96 is lowered significantly creating a relatively flat profile <br /> grade which in turn causes difficulties in conveying large volumes of storm water over long <br /> distances. In addition, an existing 60 inch diameter storm sewer outfall from the TCAAP site <br /> crosses Highway 96 just west of the proposed bridge and drains into Round Lake. The original <br /> plan allowed for clearance of the Highway 96 storm sewer over the TCAAP outfall line, <br /> however with the lower profile of Highway 96 required for the bridge crossing, the two storm <br /> sewers intersect each other. <br /> For these reasons, it is likely that a regional storm water pond (for Highway 96 drainage) will <br /> need to be constructed in the vicinity of the Highway 10 and Highway 96 interchange in layouts <br /> #2, #3 and#4. The preferred location of the pond would be in the southwest or southeast <br /> quadrant of the interchange however other quadrants may be feasible as well. The pond would <br /> require approximately 0.5 to 0.75 acres of land depending on adjacent slopes. <br /> • Ramp Metering/HOV <br /> Based upon discussions with Bob Brown of MnDOT State Aid, it is unlikely that the north <br /> access ramps for the Highway 96/Highway 10 interchange would be required to be metered or <br /> include HOV facilities. These ramps would be considered "temporary"in that upon <br /> redevelopment of the TCAAP site, a new interchange at Gateway Boulevard would be <br /> constructed and the north ramps removed from Highway 96. If ramps were built to the south, <br /> they would be viewed as permanent facilities and likely would be considered for metering and or <br /> HOV provisions by MnDOT. <br /> TCAAP Property Acquisition <br /> We anticipate that the process to acquire property from the federally owned TCAAP site will <br /> require over two years. Mike Fix from TCAAP has been shown preliminary drawings of the <br /> proposed access ramp in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. Mr. Fix stated that he had no <br /> objection with the alignment and taking of property but warned that it may be difficult to acquire <br /> the necessary area in time to construct the roadway in 1999 or 2000. <br /> If the council decides to proceed with layout#2 or layout#3, immediate coordination with the <br /> U.S. Army will be necessary to begin the process of acquisition. A possible alternative to <br /> impacting the TCAAP property would be to construct a loop in the southeast quadrant of the <br /> • <br /> 14 <br />