My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 7:26:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/6/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/6/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HI. General Discussion <br /> 11, TCAAP Site: Arden Hills and their consultant(BRW)have recently completed a study of the Twin Cities <br /> Army Ammunition Plant(TCAAP) site redevelopment. It is anticipated that within the next 1 % years, <br /> a portion of the site will be released. While no build-out year for the entire site has been identified, it is <br /> anticipated that the TCAAP site would ultimately generate approximately 100,000 trips per day,with an • <br /> estimated 15,400 trips per day on County Road I. <br /> County Road I Improvements: Ramsey County has programmed improvements on County Road I for <br /> the year 1999. Ramsey County would like to meet with the Cities of Arden Hills and Shoreview in order <br /> to determine the development schedule of the TCAAP and WISPARK sites, and the extents of the <br /> required roadway improvements to accommodate the anticipated traffic on County Road I. <br /> City of Blaine's Concerns: The City of Blaine has proposed development on-line in the vicinity of the <br /> proposed WISPARK development. These developments were considered in the U of M Parcel traffic <br /> study as part of the potential future area development. While the City of Blaine would be supportive of <br /> improvements to the County Road J bridge over I-35W, they would also like to see improvements to the <br /> 95th Street bridge, as well as adjustments to the I-35W ramp metering rates. <br /> County Road J Bridge: Anoka County previously submitted an ISTEA application for the County Road <br /> J bridge over I-35W,but the project received a low ranking. The bridge is currently ranked 4th on Anoka <br /> County's project priority list. Mn/DOT does not have the bridge currently programmed for <br /> improvements due to the bridge's relatively high sufficiency rating. Anoka County and/or Ramsey <br /> • County will lily reapply for Federal funding for the County Road J bridge improvements. Mounds <br /> View would like see improvements to the County Road J interchange area to help relieve some of the <br /> future traffic on County Road I. <br /> IV. Next Steps: <br /> • Approach Mn/DOT in regards to getting the County Road I bridge improvements into programming. <br /> • Finalin.the U of M Parcel traffic study,incorporating the WISPARK-development proposal. <br /> • Arden Hills and•Shoreview need to meet with Ramsey County to discuss County Road I <br /> improvements. <br /> SSIRAMsWA( {oREVW1Wz 141N.WPn <br /> • <br /> • <br /> •• <br /> • <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.