My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 7:33:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/14/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/14/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? rt.oe 1 <br /> Page 7 a .1 <br /> • August 24, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> public who don't have the information before them as the Council does. "There is nothing in the <br /> Resolution that binds the City to any project," he added. <br /> Stigney stated that by approving the Resolution, the City would be presupposing that the <br /> Mermaid Project was going to happen, and it is asking that the City pay $4,500 to have the <br /> financial consultant review this process. Stigney added, if the consultant can get the City better <br /> bonding rates, he would be all for it. But if the Resolution is tied into the Mermaid Project, the <br /> residents should be given the chance to voice their opinions on the issue. <br /> McCarty read Resolution No. 5259 into the record. <br /> VOTE: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried <br /> C. Consideration of City Hall Renovation Bids <br /> Michael Cox, Wold Architects, gave his report as follows: <br /> • Bids for the Construction and Renovation of the City Hall were received and opened August 20, <br /> 1998. The renovation work will include: <br /> 1. Replacement of the roof-mounted ventilation and air conditioning units <br /> 2. Reroofing <br /> 3. Water proofing the lower level <br /> 4. Tuck-pointing and other miscellaneous repairs <br /> Eleven bids were received. The low bid, which came in lower than the budget, was from Ebert <br /> Construction of Corcoran Minnesota. Their bid amount was $204,600. The contractor has <br /> submitted letters of reference and Wold was recommending that the City enter into a contract <br /> with the low bidder. <br /> Stigney asked for clarification in fire protection figures as stated in the bid. <br /> Cox stated one option had more fire protection than in the other. He added that the overall <br /> project cost of$315,000 included contingencies for unknowns, payments for fees, and testing. <br /> Ebert's low bid would lower this amount because their bid was low than the budgeted amount. <br /> Stigney stated concerns about approving $30,000 to do water proofing in the basement. <br /> • McCarty stated that all of the items listed in the schedule for correction are items that the full <br /> Council approved after a very lengthy process of finding out exactly what work had to be done <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.