Laserfiche WebLink
=I�1: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section I p <br /> REPORT Report Number: (D O L <br /> I ISTAFF <br /> UNIT: r Report Date: 9/19/96 <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE .— <br /> al li., <br /> i:;E?S?7 September 23, 1996 - Special Order of Bus. <br /> .1. <br /> Consent`Part»tot4s Consent Agenda <br /> _ Public Hearings <br /> X Council Business <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 5009 initiating eminent domain proceedings and the use of <br /> the quick take process under Chapter 117 of the Minnesota State Statutes for an easement on a portion of the <br /> property located at 2535-2585 Highway 10 and identified by PIN#07-30-23-11-0079 for construction of a ' <br /> pedestrian bridge over Highway 10. <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: <br /> The City is pursuing construction of a pedestrian bridge over Highway 10 at Long Lake Road. A bridge <br /> design has been developed by BRW;a consulting firm, and a citizens committee. Progress on this project <br /> depends on obtaining easements from adjacent property owners for the location of bridge abutments and for <br /> construction. One of the easements is for the bridge abutment on the north side of the highway on property <br /> which is part of Mounds View Square shopping center. Staff has discussed acquiring an easement with the <br /> property owners. The owners are concerned about the effect of the bridge placement on the visibility of the <br /> Ilkopping center and its sign. They have asked whether the City could, in exchange, approve a sign variance as <br /> ell as the addition of square footage to the shopping center. We have been advised by the City Attorney that <br /> the approval of a variance cannot be guaranteed through an easement agreement, but the variance request ' <br /> must go through the normal process. <br /> At your study session on September 3, 1996, staff presented several options for acquiring this easement. Staff <br /> is suggesting that the City Council pursue two of these options at the same time, to assure that the easement <br /> will be obtained within the necessary time frame. <br /> Option 1: The property owners intend to submit an application for a conditional use permit regarding joint use <br /> of parking, and variances for a new center identification sign and for revised parking ratios. We have <br /> estimated that the variance requests could be before Planning Commission, and the CUP before City Council <br /> by the end of November or beginning of December. Our consultant working on the bridge, Sabri Ayaz, has <br /> told us that the easements need to be acquired by December 15. This schedule will allow the property owners <br /> to know the decision on their requests in time to grant an easement, before the December 15 deadline. <br /> Option 2: As insurance at this point, the City Council would initiate eminent domain proceedings for acquiring <br /> the easement using the"quick take" process. This process takes 90 days, and once initiated, will result in the <br /> City receiving the easement. A resolution has been prepared authorizing the acquisition of this easement. <br /> (14AVILL JAWA-Ari\-- • <br /> arriela Sheldon, Community Developent Director <br /> ilCOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acquisition of property by <br /> proceedings in eminent domain. <br />