My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-1996 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-14-1996 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:34 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 11:12:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/14/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/14/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
y i <br /> CITY Cf CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Agenda Section <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: <br /> • OrgAIP.VSTAFF REPORT Report Date: 10/10/96 <br /> 0 � <br /> r ,:,h <br /> .7 <br /> .p, <br /> v:.:::,, , CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE — Special Order of Bus. <br /> .–es'.Partn¢o°s October 14, 1996 — p <br /> Consent Agenda <br /> Public Hearings <br /> Council Business <br /> Item Description: Review of September 23, 1996 City Council Meeting Minutes and Subsequent <br /> Consideration of Resolutions 5029 and 5030. <br /> Executive Director's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary:,Some questions were raised about whether the City Council should have accepted Sue Hankner's <br /> resignation and the ensuing declaration of vacancy by resolution instead of by motion. Mounds View City <br /> Charter requires that a resolution be passed for this type of action and the Council may want to consider <br /> affirming their actions of the last meeting by adopting resolutions 5029 and 5030 as drafted by City Attorney <br /> Bob Long. Bob and I discussed the appropriate way in which to do this, either by having the Council amend <br /> their minutes of the September 23 actions to reflect the actions as resolutions, or to simply proceed with the <br /> normal adoption of the minutes and then readdress the actions with reaffirming resolutions. The reason for <br /> this is as much consistency with past practice as with anything else. <br /> have also asked Bob to send me a letter outlining the position he stated regarding the Council's appropriate <br /> 111 <br /> course of action for accepting the resignation and then declaring a vacancy. As the Council is aware by now, <br /> much of this is being questioned by the Charter Commission, with the essential concern being that without a <br /> special election, voters will be voting for two candidates for three seats. The timing of the resignation, after <br /> the notice of filings close, has the most to do with that situation. I expect to have Bob's letter by Monday and <br /> will forward copies to the Council as soon as possible. <br /> As for Monday evening, I recommend the Council ask Bob to review the option to adopt the two resolutions <br /> at the time the Council is reviewing the Council minutes. If the Council chooses, it can approve the minutes <br /> with the actions as motions as it happened, then add to the agenda the two resolutions reaffirming the actions. <br /> Also, the Council may want to take this opportunity to acknowledge the resolution it received from the <br /> Charter Commission last week. <br /> C4442.0 -4. <br /> Chuck Whiting, Cit Administrator <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.