My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-29-1996 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-29-1996 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:47 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 11:17:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/29/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/29/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
g mf or CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Agenda Section <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: <br /> (�11 PD STAFF REPORT Report Date: 10/25/96 <br /> 0 <br /> COUNCIL MEETING MEETING DATE — <br /> , [ .cw _ Special Order of Bus. <br /> m <br /> '' eat•Partner''* October 25, 1996 <br /> X Consent Agenda <br /> Public Hearings <br /> — <br /> Council Business <br /> Item Description: Comments Relating to Surplus Property Disposal <br /> Executive Director's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: I would like to note to the City Council my preference for the manner in which the City disposes of <br /> surplus property. I have always found it to be in the City's best interest to dispose of surplus property, particularly . <br /> where there is likely interest in a piece of property,to turn the disposal over to an auction house. This will do two <br /> things, first staff does not have to take time oversee a bidding situation, and second, the perception of fairness is <br /> much easier to maintain in such a setting than it is if bids are taken internally. Going to an auction house will <br /> require the City give a cut to the auction house. Unless the Council prefers otherwise, this is my preference for <br /> disposing of surplus and I would like to consider it the administrative policy of the City. <br /> C(12€'11 . <br /> buck Whiting, City Ad .nistrator <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.