My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-04-1996 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-04-1996 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:53 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 11:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/4/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/4/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> env OF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section• <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: g1 Q-1 gbnn <br /> 61r1Tj <br /> Report Date: 10/30/96 <br /> ;.11111 ,11HOSWORK SESSION MEETING DATE - <br /> 40 .:. <br /> 'AilE#i 11 November 4. 1996 <br /> a'�ss•Partne k4. <br /> Item Description: Discussion of EDC's Recommendation for Professional Services for the Study of Highway <br /> 10 - Section 9. <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: <br /> The Economic Development Commission interviewed five candidate firms for the study of Highway 10 - . <br /> Section 9 on October 24th and October 29th. The firms that were interviewed included BRW, Inc.; Dahlgren, <br /> Shardlow, and Uban, Inc.; State of Minnesota,Department of Administration; SRF Consulting and Sanders <br /> Wacker Wehrman Bergly, Inc. <br /> The majority of the proposals were very competitive regarding services offered and the price range for those <br /> services. The EDC feels that community participation from the stakeholders in the area is very important as <br /> 410 ell as market analysis and a final product that can be used to attract developers for the desired uses. <br /> After careful considerations and two mornings dedicated to the interviews,the EDC is recommending SRF Consulting <br /> Group for a maximum cost of$25,000 to be taken from the tax increment fund that is set aside for the redevelopment <br /> of Highway 10. <br /> Attached is a copy of the RFP that was mailed to over 15 firms and the primary components of SRF's proposal. <br /> Representatives from SRF will be in attendance to present their proposal. In addition, members of the EDC will be <br /> available to answer questions. <br /> The EDC would like their recommendation to be formally considered at the November 12, 1996 regular meeting so <br /> that the 3-4 month study process can begin ASAP. <br /> ft <br /> Cathy Bennett, G.n. Dev. Coordinator <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.