Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br /> October 14, 1996110 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> attention of the City Council. He noted that the Council's action on September 23, 1996 in accepting <br /> Council member Hankner's resignation by a simple motion appears non-conforming to Charter Section <br /> 2.05,MN State Law 410.21 and Charter Section 4.05. He further stated that the Charter Commission <br /> respectfully suggests that Council member Hankner resubmit her resignation effective by November 4, <br /> 1996 to insure compliance with the Charter requirements should it remain her desire to avoid a Special <br /> Election. The Charter Commission also requested that the City Council not act on any Charter changes <br /> currently before them. <br /> Mr.Bob Long,City Attorney,explained that the Council was unaware of Ms.Hankner's resignation until <br /> the September 23rd meeting,therefore a Resolution had not be prepared for approval at the meeting. What <br /> the Council did was act by a motion due to the absence of a written resolution with the intention of <br /> approving the Resolution at the next meeting. He explained that the City has followed the Charter <br /> requirements and that under Section 2.05 of the Charter,one of the conditions in which the City Council <br /> can acknowledge a vacancy that is deemed to exist is when a written resignation is before them. A written <br /> letter was submitted by Ms.Hankner at the September 23rd meeting. In regard to resignations which <br /> become effective at a future date,the Charter is silent,and therefore the City must refer to State Law. <br /> Ruth White,2917 County Road I,noted a correction of Charter Commission Resolution 96-1. The ninth <br /> paragraph should be changed from"City Council"to "City Charter". <br /> 4111 <br /> Alice Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road,stated as an election judge she feels the way the Ms.Hankner's Council <br /> seat will be filled is unfair to people who are now running for office and those who may have run if they <br /> had been aware of the other position available. She feels it is unfair to the voters because the ballots will <br /> not disclose that they will be voting for three. She would like the Council to reconsider having a special <br /> election. <br /> David Jahnke,8428 Eastwood Road, asked if the ballots will be fixed so that voters will know that they <br /> are voting for three. <br /> Mayor Linke noted that the ballots will not be fixed. <br /> Attorney Long explained that the State Law requires that the City turn in the names of the candidates to the <br /> County Auditor within 45 days of the election. At the time they were submitted,there were only two <br /> council seats open. The Charter also states that the City cannot file less than 56 days before the election. <br /> Therefore,the seats will be filled by the two receiving the most votes,but a third name is not being listed <br /> on the ballot because they have already be turned in to the County. <br /> Mayor Linke explained that the voters will be electing the two four-year term seats. Voters will be made <br /> aware that even though they are only voting for two,three people will be elected. The third highest vote <br /> will take over Ms.Hankner's remaining two years. <br /> Ms.Hankner explained that in a general election,there will be a larger number of people voting that the <br /> city will get in a special election. The city is following the State Law and the Charter Requirement and the <br /> City is fulfilling their responsibility of abiding by those guidelines. <br /> • <br /> It was noted that voters will be told that they can only vote for two. If they vote for three,the ballot will be <br /> 411 <br /> spoiled. <br />