Laserfiche WebLink
ca:. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section ��.(/J//�//r <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: <br /> •iI • Report Date: 9/5/96 <br /> 0 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE —. <br /> Special Order of Bus. <br /> . <br /> '," 'k September 9. 1996 <br /> P <br /> Consent Agenda <br /> 'v est•Partnees°s <br /> Public Hearings <br /> Council Business <br /> Item Description: Quad Ice Rink Project at National Sports Center <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summaty(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: After last week's meeting with council members from New Brighton, Arden Hills and Shoreview, <br /> the message to proceed with pursuing the County's interest in financing a rink at the National Sports Center <br /> was clear. This past Tuesday, as I reported at the work session, I sat in on the County Board meeting for their <br /> discussion. Some confusion muddled the issue when Paul Erickson of the NSC suggested Ramsey County <br /> consider putting $1 million towards two rinks at the Blaine facility instead of building one additional rink in the <br /> suburbs for even more money. It appears the commissioners and county staff were expecting a request of <br /> $500,000 for one sheet in Blaine and referred the whole matter back to staff for clarification. Since no <br /> decision was going to be made by the board last Tuesday anyway, nothing other than an indication of their <br /> ()approval or disapproval was expected. Unfortunately, the impression I had was that the confusion may have <br /> dampened their interest. It would still seem however that if the County wishes for a new sheet of ice in the <br /> suburbs to offset their decision to help with the Highland rink, that at least one rink in Blaine will be the way <br /> to go. Unfortunately, as of this writing, I do not know the status of any of this, and may not know until <br /> Monday. <br /> As it is, I have had Paul Erickson and Gordie Voss scheduled to attend on Monday evening and make a <br /> presentation on the project. Originally, this meeting was intended to bring the project to the community for <br /> their reaction, and the Council could decide whether to join in at the September 23 meeting. While I think this <br /> still needs to be done, I sense concern from our neighboring communities which are in our group on this rink, <br /> that if the County doesn't participate, they may not either. If that is the case, I don't think there will be <br /> enough time to regroup and go back to the previous option of having the hockey associations fund the escrow <br /> and front the $500,000 for the single sheet. To further complicate this, another rink, the fourth rink is still <br /> needed to make this thing go. Brooklyn Park is the community debating whether to commit to that rink. I <br /> think Erickson's appeal to the County for two•rinks was a hedge against Brooklyn Park's decision. <br /> If the rinks cannot have commitments made to them by the end of the month, the Mighty Ducks funding for <br /> the Quad Rink project expires and the whole project may have to wait another year. I will be sure to find out <br /> what the County and Paul Erickson come up with by meeting time Monday. <br /> ORECOMMENDATION: <br />