Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 1t0/,S <br /> Report Date: 8/27/96 <br /> • WORKSESrSION MEETING DATE <br /> %m September 3, 1996 <br /> •A :iiia` <br /> -iesF'PanDet'NA's <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Water Conservation Measures <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. X <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: <br /> The City was mandated by the Met Council to develop a Water Emergency and Conservation Plan in 1995. <br /> This plan is currently in the review stages at Met Council. One comment from Met Council was, that the City <br /> should introduce and proceed with additional conservation measures. The only measure currently in place is <br /> the seasonal watering ban. The State Plumbing Code requires low flow faucet aerators and low flow toilets. <br /> Staff attended sessions at the Water Conference this year where conservation measures and retrofits were <br /> highly valued. Staff received information from vendors to provide both low flow faucet aerators and toilet tank <br /> dams as part of a possible start to the City's conservation plan. <br /> An analysis based on water pumped and wastewater treatment measured by Met Council show a steady <br /> •increase in the amount of wastewater produced, and some peaks in an otherwise average amount of water <br /> production. By initiating these two conservation measures, the residents could reduce the amount of water <br /> consumed and decrease the wastewater produced. Revenues would be slightly reduces from water sales, and <br /> expenses related to wastewater treatment would also be reduced. The following is the results of the analysis. It <br /> is based on the usage of an average family of four. <br /> The toilet tank dams could reduce the usage from 6 gallons per flush to 3.5 gallons per flush. This could result <br /> in a reduction of wastewater treatment expenses by approximately $35,000.00 or a 67 % savings. Resulting <br /> wastewater produced would be approximately 28.30 million gallons per year. Water production could be <br /> reduced by 28.3 million gallons per year with the toilet dams alone. Water revenue is anticipated to be reduced <br /> by $36,790. It is unknown the amount of water conservation that would be achieved through the low flow <br /> aerators. <br /> The cost to provide every residential property with a kit which would include one pair of toilet tank dams, one <br /> low flow aerator, one dye tablet for toilet bowls is $21,115.00. Funds were budgeted, $5,000.00 in the Water <br /> Department, for conservation education and measures in the 1996 budget. Staff is requesting a transfer of <br /> funds from the Water Contingency Fund of$5,000.00 and the remaining $11,115.00 transferred from the <br /> Wastewater Contingency Fund to the Infrastructure fund to pay for the retrofits. Staff will delivery the packets <br /> and information to the residents. (Additional single units will be available should residents request them.) The <br /> anticipated pay back for the retrofits is approximately 7 '/2 months. Staff will provide further explanation of the <br /> calculations at the work session. Staff will advertise this program in the local papers and cable TV if Council <br /> approves and authorizes the program. <br /> • „. <br /> Michael Ulrich, Director of Public orks <br />