My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1996/07/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agenda Packets - 1996/07/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:02 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 6:35:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/15/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•s <br /> STAFF REPORT FOR ORDINANCE NO. 584 <br /> JULY 15, 1996 <br /> PAGE TWO OF TWO <br /> Planning Commission Resolution No. 448-96, approving a variance for an eight foot <br /> encroachment into the required thirty foot front yard setback off Adams Street was approved by <br /> the Commission on June 05, 1996. A contingency was added that if the applicants failed to <br /> receive a code amendment to Chapter 1123 entitled"Nonconforming Buildings, Uses and <br /> Structures," that the variance would be void. <br /> Applicant Tom Manke, has gathered a petition, including 269 names, in favor of the canopy at the <br /> site. This petiton was presented at the June 24, 1996 City Council meeeting. <br /> The intent of Chapter 1123 of the Municipal Code is listed as: "the intent of this chapter is that all <br /> nonconforming uses shall be eventually brought into conformity." The proposed Ordinance No. <br /> 584 would exempt canopies on a legal nonconforming use site from being considered an <br /> enlargement of the property. Thus, a canopy on a legal nonconforming use site would not be <br /> considered an enlargement, but would be required to adhere to required setback of the zoning <br /> district. <br /> Thus, the request before the City Council is whether to consider adoption of Ordnance No. 584, <br /> an Ordinance Amending Title 1123, entitled, "Nonconforming Building Structures and Uses." <br /> The City Attorney has reviewed this ordinance and has found it is acceptable in form. <br /> 411 <br /> Adoption of this ordinance will require a roll call vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.