My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-01-1996 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-01-1996 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:11 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 7:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/1/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/1/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Mounds View, Minnesota <br /> February 28, 1996 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 110 establishment of a redevelopment project is governed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028. <br /> To undertake a redevelopment project, the HRA must apply to the governing body (City Council <br /> or County Board). The application includes the redevelopment plan, a statement of the <br /> proposed method of financing the project and the written opinion of the planning commission. <br /> Before approving the redevelopment plan, the governing body must hold a public hearing. <br /> Notice of the hearing shall be published not less than 10 nor more than 30 days prior to the <br /> hearing. To approve the project, the governing body must make the following findings by <br /> resolution: <br /> 1. The land in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the <br /> financial aid to be sought; <br /> The redevelopment plan will afford the maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs <br /> of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of the areas by private or public <br /> enterprise; and <br /> 3. The redevelopment plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the locality <br /> as a whole. <br /> The statutes governing EDA's create a much less cumbersome process. The EDA may, by its <br /> ,lution, issue revenue bonds. This action does not require the approval of any other <br /> :ince the EDA has been created, no other public hearings are required. However, an <br /> EDA exercising HRA powers would be required to follow the process described above. <br /> Considerations for Usina Lease Financing <br /> Both the annual appropriation lease and the lease revenue bonds have the same underlying <br /> security. They also share many important considerations in their use: <br /> 1. Applications. Leases are a viable option for municipal buildings, public safety facilities <br /> and public works buildings. This finance option also has applications in shared facilities, <br /> such as the proposed City/School District joint facility. <br /> 2. Essentiality. Not all facilities are equally well-suited to lease financing. The more <br /> essential the facility, the less likely that the issuer will fail to appropriate funds to make <br /> lease payments. For example, it is difficult to imagine circumstances where a city would <br /> fail to appropriate funds on a lease to finance a city hall. The perception of security can <br /> help to overcome the risks of the actual security. <br /> 3. Rating. Like revenue bonds, lease financing constitutes a new rating. This opportunity <br /> creates flexibility in the decision to seek a rating from the rating agency. Past <br /> experience suggests that an annual appropriations pledge results in a rating one-half to <br /> one grade lower than a general obligation rating. <br /> 4. Arbitrage Rebate. An annual appropriation lease using COP's may be exempt from <br /> arbitrage rebate through either the $5 million small issuer exemption or the two-year <br /> expenditure test. Lease revenue bonds issued by an HRA or an EDA are not eligible for <br /> the small issuer exemption. It is important to note that even though the bonds cannot <br /> take advantage of the small issuer exemption, they would count against the issuer's <br /> calendar year limit. <br /> 4110 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.