Laserfiche WebLink
'':;ii'Mr.' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section 11 F <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 96—t6 3 C <br /> I1 ; �j i ;s Report Date: 3/21/96 <br /> • CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE — <br /> March 25. 1996 Special Order of Bus. <br /> Consent Agenda <br /> r'''e ss'Party,,,,stk s I. <br /> Public Hearings <br /> X Council Business <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Surface Water Pond Abandonment, Long Lake Road & TH10 <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: /t <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report X �,teT <br /> __ <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: Staff presented a proposal to Council at the March 4, 1996 work session explaining the <br /> possibility of abandoning the surface water pond at the intersection of Long Lake Road and TH 10 for the <br /> purpose of constructing the pedestrian bridge. Staff was directed to consult with the City's engineer for an <br /> estimate of the cost pertaining to the filling of the pond and subsequent storm sewer pipe construction. Staff <br /> spoke with Steve Campbell regarding this matter. Steve explained that any estimates given at this time, prior <br /> to surveying, computer modeling, and negotiations with the agencies involved, would be extremely <br /> conservative. Cost estimates for the construction portion of the project are as follows: <br /> Storm Sewer Revisions(A) $5,000 - $10,000 <br /> • Fill Existing Pond $5,000 - $ 7,500 <br /> Subtotal $10,000 $17,500 <br /> Construct Mitigation Pond(B) $10,000 - $15.000 <br /> Total Est $20,000 - $32,500 <br /> (A) Assumes that the existing storm sewer along the west boulevard of Long Lake Road is high enough to be <br /> relieved by the existing system under long Lake Road and parallel to STH 10. This will be verified by the field <br /> surveys. <br /> (B) I required by regulatory agencies. To be located on City property south of Public Works Facility. <br /> The two proposals received for this study were from BRW Inc. for $7,620 and SEH for $6,900. <br /> Staff met with Paster Enterprises on Tuesday, March 19, 1996 to discuss issues regarding the preferred bridge <br /> design. Mr. Paster requested mal items of information from staff regarding traffic counts on Hwy 10 and <br /> any pedestrian patterns in the area. Staff would request that this item be tabled until the April 1 Council <br /> work session for further discussion. <br /> Accompaning this report is the Pedestrian Bridge Work Plan requested at the March 4, 1996 work session. <br /> / <br /> z <br /> IIVCOMMENDATION: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> able this issue until the April 1 Council work session, at which time more information will be available. <br /> 1 <br />