Agenda Packets - 1996/02/12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

m" CF Agenda Section: 10, 7: 10p.m. Y' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 96-1602.0©UNDO Report Date: 2-8-96 STAFF REPORT Council Action: .ADV�^ C Special Order of Business -4'"4•Partnen04 Feb r:.t _`z '"12., 1996: 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE t Public Hearings O Consent Agenda O Council Business ItemLAonsidperatibn of Resolution No. 4879 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to establish a residential Dog Kennel for Geri Grosslein, 8455 Red Oak Drive (Planning Case No. 429-95) Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Geri Grosslein has made application for a Conditional Use permit in order to establish a Residential Dog Kennel on her property at 8455 Red Oak Drive. Chapter 1106.04, Subdivision 4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows Residential Dog/Cat kennels in R-1, Single Family zone districts with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. A Residential Dog/Cat kennel is defined as"any premises where more than • two (2), but not more than four(4) dogs/cats over six(6) months of age are owned, boarded, bred or offered for sale." 'Vs. Grosslein has three (3) dogs residing on the property, including two (2) Shar-pei and one (1) Chow. accination certificates for the three dogs have been presented to the City and municipal dog licenses were purchased on December 28, 1995 for: Kai, a female Shar-pei; Bailey, a female Shar-pei; and Lindsey, a female spayed Chow. The rear yard of 8455 Red Oak Drive is surrounded by a chain link fence. In addition to Chapter 1106, Chapter 701.04, Subdivision 15 requires that all applicants for Residential kennels provide the City Council with a petition signed by over 50 percent of all registered land owners or i those occupying land with 500 feet of the subject property. Fifty seven(57) properties, are located within or are, or touching, the 500 feet radius of 8455 Red Oak Drive. Thus, a minimum of 29 signatures were required for submission to the planning Commission and Council for action. A map noting the 57 properties and the 29 who signed is enclosed for your review. (Signatures shown with hatch-marks on the attached map). Two separate complaints were received by the Police Department on September 29, 1995 regarding Ms. Grosslein's dogs. One report was for four dogs present on the property. Ms. Grosslein explained to the Planning Commission that one of the dogs has been removed from the property, as it was only being i. watched for another individual. The second report was for Geri Grosslein's Char-Pei dog biting a neighbor dog on the back with two puncture wounds. Ms. Grosslein explained to the Planning Commission that her neighbor, Ms. Murphy, has a dog that had been accessing her yard by running over a downed tree between the two yards and provoking her dogs for quite some time. Ms. Grosslein stated the Shar-pei was the youngest of her dogs Illknd had chose to retaliate against the other dog on September 20, 1995. She notified the Planning ommission that the three dogs are only outside now under short supervised periods of time and are }2.FCOMMENDATION;