My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1996/02/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agenda Packets - 1996/02/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:17 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 8:31:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/5/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/5/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCESS USED TO RESPOND TO MANAGEMENT STUDY <br /> The process used to respond to the Management Study included the following: <br /> • Establishment of a Management Core Team consisting of the City Manager and Bob <br /> Larsen, and the Directors of the following departments: Fire, Inspections, Community <br /> Development, and MIS <br /> • Facilitated offsite meetings: 4-1/2 days (Management Core Team and Karen Werve) <br /> • Interim onsite meetings (Management Core Team only) <br /> • Collaboration: Management Core Team led by the City Manager engaged in <br /> unprecedented open dialogue and debate on issues in the community, collectively taking on <br /> the "City leadership" role, to achieve an integrated plan that made sense and could be <br /> supported by every manager on the Core Team <br /> • "Powered through" list of issues raised as a result of the Management Study to create a <br /> plan embedded with several core values that integrates the needs and concerns of Council, <br /> community, and staff as discerned from the interviews conducted by consultant, Karen <br /> Werve <br /> • Key ingredient yet to be scheduled: Staff involvement in "fleshing out" the "skeleton • <br /> design and addressing key implementation issues <br /> • Bottom line issue: Alignment <br /> Alignment is having the elements of design all supporting and reinforcing each other (as <br /> depicted on the diagram on the next page), and thereby moving the organization forward. <br /> When these elements are misaligned -- as with the City when the stated goals of <br /> redevelopment/economic development are very different from the City's mission of <br /> enforcement (by default) -- the organization's energy becomes diffused, and the organization <br /> inadvertently ends up fighting itself. The result is that problems exist, but no one is sure <br /> why, until ultimately the organization is pulled apart with inefficiencies and lack of results. <br /> Staff are all working hard; but without cohesion, results are not achieved, and their efforts <br /> go unnoticed or unappreciated. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.