Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Center Child Care Review <br />September 12, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />needs. By having the YMCA assume custodial services, our staff could assume the same <br />services at City Hall, resulting in a savings of $19,000. Another benefit to the City would <br />include the elimination of an annual property tax payment, saving about $8,400 each year. <br />Finally, the YMCA indicates that room rentals would increase which would increase the <br />annual revenues shared between the YMCA and City. Estimating conservatively, the <br />revenue share could increase by 10%, bringing in an additional $3,300. Thus, the total <br />annual savings would be about $30,000 if the YMCA were the child care provider. <br /> <br />The owners of Creative Kids Academy do not wish to leave the facility and believe their <br />business provides a valuable service to the community. Rajiv Garg, co-owner of Creative <br />Kids Academy with Sangeeta Jain, indicated that they would be willing to cover the <br />property taxes if allowed to continue leasing the space, and encouraged the Council to <br />reject the YMCA proposal. <br /> <br />As stated previously in this report, the lease agreement with Creative Kids provides for a <br />one-year notice of termination. As a public building owned by the City, the City needs to <br />have full flexibility to make plans which are in the best interest of the community. The <br />City’s original intent was to lease only to tenants which were public, quasi-public, or non- <br />profit. Previous tenants in the facility included the Mounds View School District, the <br />Chamber of Commerce and a small transportation company serving elderly and disabled <br />residents. When the Chamber vacated its space, the YMCA repurposed the rooms for <br />programmed activities, expressing a need for more programmed space. <br /> <br />At the September work session, Twin Cities North Chamber President, Todd Kruse, had <br />passed along a Chamber policy statement expressing its opposition to the City leasing <br />space to either the YMCA or Creative Kids, and that the City should honor the full lease <br />term with Creative Kids. The Chamber suggests that the City should not pick winners and <br />losers, and generally speaking, staff would agree with the sentiment, especially in its <br />capacity as the regulatory body. However, in the case where the City is the property owner <br />and landlord, and the City desires to lease to other government entities, public corporations <br />or non-profits, the question isn’t about picking a winner or loser but rather making a <br />decision in the best interest of the community. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends the City Council review the proposal submitted by the YMCA and <br />discuss whether it is in the City’s best interest to terminate the Creative Kids Lease early or <br />reject the proposal submitted by the YMCA. If the Council believes the community would <br />benefit from terminating the lease early, Resolution 8617 can be reconsidered for action. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />City Administrator