Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />the document more simple to utilize. She questioned when the updates would be posted on the 1 <br />City’s website. City Administrator Ericson anticipated the new fee schedule would be posted on 2 <br />the website mid-December. 3 <br /> 4 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5 <br /> 6 <br />D. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 928, Approving Planning and 7 <br />Development Fees. 8 <br /> 9 <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council introduce an Ordinance that would approve 10 <br />planning and development fees. He reviewed the proposed changes to the major and minor 11 <br />subdivision fees and recommended approval. 12 <br /> 13 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance 928, 14 <br />Approving Planning and Development Fees. 15 <br /> 16 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 17 <br /> 18 <br />E. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 930, Establishing Residency 19 <br />Restrictions for Level 3 Predatory Offenders. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council introduce an Ordinance establishing residency 22 <br />restrictions for Level 3 Predatory Offenders. He reported this item was discussed with the City 23 <br />Attorney and the Police Department. He explained residency restrictions have been adopted by 24 <br />many neighboring communities to prevent Level 3 Predatory Offenders from living near schools, 25 <br />parks, playgrounds, daycares or churches. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned where Level 1 and Level 2 offenders could live. City 28 <br />Administrator Ericson reported Level 1 and Level 2 offenders were not public information and 29 <br />the proposed Ordinance did not apply to these individuals. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Mueller requested further information on the differences between a Level 32 <br />1/Level 2 offender compared to a Level 3 offender. Police Chief Harder explained the various 33 <br />levels were assigned by the State based on risk and likelihood to reoffend. He indicated Level 1 34 <br />offenders were to remain private and no notification could be made to the public. He stated 35 <br />Level 2 offenders were allowed some notification and Level 3 was a mandated notification. He 36 <br />commented the City has only had one Level 3 offender living within the City limits and that was 37 <br />for about three hours. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if the Minnesota Sex Offender Program had a responsibility to 40 <br />notify cities when Level 3 offenders moved into a community. City Attorney Riggs advised this 41 <br />was a State entity that had to notify communities. He commented on the checks and compliance 42 <br />issues that were maintained by the Police Department. He believed the City would be in a 43 <br />decent position by approving the proposed Ordinance. 44 <br /> 45