My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2015/03/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
Agenda Packets - 2015/03/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:51 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 4:35:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/9/2015
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/9/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 23, 2015 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />good condition. Staff further discussed the condition of the roadways, noting the areas that were 1 <br />currently flooding. The project timeline was reviewed. Staff recommended that the Council hold 2 <br />a public hearing and take comments from the public. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Blaine Krugerud, BioClean, requested further information on the project phasing. He stated that 7 <br />his operation had trucking needs and he wanted to be assured that his business would not be 8 <br />adversely impacted by the proposed project. He was concerned with how the exits and entrances 9 <br />would be addressed. Interim Public Works Director Peterson explained that the phasing of the 10 <br />street would not be available until after the project was ordered. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Dave Fox, Fed Tech, expressed concern with the flooding that occurs in his parking lot during 13 <br />heavy rains. He requested that the water from the street no longer flow from the street into his 14 <br />parking lot. Mayor Flaherty commented that all water runoff and drainage issues would be 15 <br />addressed through this project. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Hearing no further public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. 18 <br /> 19 <br />B. Resolution 8377, Approving Plans and Specifications for 2015 SUIP – Area 20 <br />H. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Interim Public Works Director Peterson discussed the City’s Street Improvement Program. He 23 <br />explained that Area H, which consisted of 2.4 miles, would be completed in 2015. It was noted 24 <br />staff completed bidding documents. He stated the Groveland Lift Station would be rehabilitated 25 <br />through this project. The project timeline was reviewed. Staff discussed the project details 26 <br />further and requested that the Council approve the plans and specifications for the 2015 SUIP. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Mueller thanked staff for the thorough report. She asked where the sidewalk 29 <br />would be located along Groveland Road. Interim Public Works Director Peterson indicated the 30 <br />sidewalk would be located on the east side of Groveland Road, along with a bike lane. He 31 <br />reported that all utility lines would remain on the east side of the road as well. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned where the mailboxes would be located on Groveland Road. 34 <br />Interim Public Works Director Peterson commented the mailboxes would be moved to the west 35 <br />side of Groveland Road. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Mueller inquired how many large maple trees would be impacted by the 38 <br />sidewalk/bike lane. Interim Public Works Director Peterson explained staff has yet to review this 39 <br />information. He commented that the City may be applying for a forestry grant to assist with 40 <br />replacing these trees. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked how the remaining work on Area G would impact the start of the Area H 43 <br />project. Christina Mlejnek, Stantec, did not believe that the two projects would overlap or 44 <br />impact each other in 2015. Christine stated that she expected the impact to the trees would be 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.