Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 7C <br />Meeting Date: May 26, 2015 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Resolution 8415, a Resolution Approving an Exemption for <br />CenturyLink to Install and Deploy Aerial Fiber Optic Facilities in <br />Mounds View <br /> <br />Backgroun: <br /> <br />On May 4, 2015, CenturyLink representatives appeared before the City Council to review a <br />request to be exempted from Mounds View City Code Section 911.05, which requires that <br />all new or repaired utility facilities be located underground. The section of Code does <br />provide the City Council with the discretion to approve an exemption in situations where <br />undergrounding is not technically or economically feasible. CenturyLink asserts that <br />undergrounding is not economically feasible at this time. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the issue again at its meeting on May 11, 2015, moving to table the <br />request after hearing testimony from a resident who shared concerns about workmanship <br />and improper installation of the equipment. Direction was provided to meet with <br />CenturyLink and Xcel inspectors to verify that the work was being done consistent with all <br />pertinent requirements before that matter would be reconsidered by the City Council. <br /> <br />The Council next discussed the request at their meeting on Tuesday, May 26, 2015. At <br />that time, staff had confirmed that all inspections for previous work had been done and <br />approved by Xcel inspectors and CenturyLink staff. Corrections were made in some areas <br />to minimize the impact of additional guy wires. CenturyLink asked for a clarification on the <br />terms of the exemption, specifically, the aspect that would allow the new fiber optic lines to <br />be hung from poles ONLY in the event the facilities are already sited above ground. <br />Where the facilities are already underground, no exemption would be granted. The <br />company did not support this provision, indicating that there were areas (such as rear-yard <br />easement areas) where it would be impractical and prohibitively expensive to underground <br />the new facilities. The City Council directed staff to once again work with CenturyLink to <br />arrive at a compromise, and postponed action until the June 8th meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />On May 29, 2015, staff met with Aaron Krebs from CenturlyLink in an effort to bring about a <br />mutually agreeable compromise to the exemption terms. Mr. Krebs provided detailed <br />maps and plans illustrating where existing easements were and where the present facilities <br />were located either above or below ground. Aside from the illustrations, Mr. Krebs did not <br />come prepared to compromise on the terms however, suggesting that if required to <br />underground in any area, the company would simply subtract those areas from the project, <br />reducing the number of households that could access the faster connection speeds.