My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2014/04/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
Agenda Packets - 2014/04/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:28 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 5:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/14/2014
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/14/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 07E <br />* ,�0�S = TTE Meeting Date: April u 2014 <br />mess <br />1�/1 �/1 Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 886, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 607 of the Mounds View City <br />Code Relating to Commercial Vehicles <br />Introduction: <br />At the January 6th work session meeting and at the Council meeting on January 13th, the <br />City Council discussed the possibility of reviewing that section of the City Code that <br />regulates the parking of commercial vehicles in a residential district. The Council spent <br />some time at the February 3, 2014 and March 3, 2014, Work Sessions reviewing the <br />research compiled by staff and discussion potential revisions that would expand <br />allowances for parking commercial vehicles in residential districts. <br />History: <br />Commercial vehicles have always been prohibited from being parked in residential districts, <br />although an attempt was made in 1981 to change that. After numerous complaints from <br />truck owners, the City Council adopted Ordinance 303 which served to eliminate the <br />prohibition against commercial vehicles. Residents were opposed to the potential influx of <br />commercial vehicles in their neighborhoods however and circulated petitions against the <br />ordinance. As a result of their efforts, a special election was held on August 18, 1981, to <br />vote on the issue, and the ordinance was over -turned by more than a two -to -one margin. <br />The Nuisance Code underwent a rewrite in 2002, and as a result, two specific references <br />regarding commercial vehicles were added for clarification purposes. The first amendment <br />redefined a commercial vehicle to be any vehicle bearing a weight classification greater <br />than "E". Prior to the amendment, if the license plate exhibited ANY weight classification, it <br />was considered commercial. The second revision added a reference to vehicles with more <br />than one rear axle. <br />Discussion: <br />After discussing the issue at previous work sessions and regular meetings, the Council <br />seemed to support amending the City Code to increase the weight classification allowed to <br />be parked in residential districts from "E" (6,001 - 10,000 lbs) to "G" (12,001 –15,000 lbs.) <br />In addition, the Council expressed support for excluding pick-up trucks and passenger <br />vans—those that would otherwise be ordinary residential vehicles but for an optional <br />weight classification—from being defined as a commercial vehicle. The Council indicated <br />that they did not support increasing the numberof commercial vehicles on a property and <br />would limit the number of tires on such vehicles to no more than six. All other parking and <br />nuisance code requirements would apply unchanged. The Council had considered the <br />possibility of instituting a permit or license for such vehicles but ultimately felt it to be <br />unnecessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.