My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-2014 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-11-2014 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:31 PM
Creation date
6/20/2018 2:39:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/11/2014
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/11/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 7A <br />Meeting Date: August 11, 2014 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />Administrator Review: ________ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Discussion to Amend the Developer’s Agreement for <br />Longview Estates, Developed by EICHI, Inc., <br /> 5173 Longview Drive; Planning Case MA2014-001 <br /> Introduction: <br />On July 28, 2014, the City Council approved a Developer’s Agreement with Marty Harstad, <br />representing Eichi, Inc. for the 10-lot subdivision of Longview Estates. This 7.14 acre parcel is <br />on the west side of Longview Drive between County Road H2 and Woodale Drive. Mr. Harstad <br />is asking that the Council lower the financial guarantee amounts stated in the agreement. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Mr. Harstad will be doing the land preparation and soil correction for the 10 building sites. As <br />with all developments, the City requires a “Developer’s Agreement” which has specific <br />requirements and financial guarantees for each development that is occurring. Since the land <br />preparation will involve extensive truck traffic and is occurring in a neighborhood with newly <br />constructed city streets, an additional restoration security deposit was added in the developer’s <br />agreement for any street repair needed (Article 2.03c). Staff did not know what the haul route <br />would be prior to drafting the agreement, so the large amount of $75,000 was put in to the <br />agreement to cover street repairs on the entire street area where truck traffic could be. Staff <br />has since had a meeting with the contractor who has designated a specific route for the truck <br />traffic which is the shortest route possible on the new streets. City Staff is agreeable to <br />lowering the restoration security deposit amount to $20,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad has also asked that the financial guarantee amount in Article 2.07 be lowered from <br />$20,000. The City requires this financial guarantee in case of default or abandonment of the <br />project and the City then needing to finish the work or secure the site. Since only dirt work will <br />occur, and Mr. Harstad has already provided a $25,000 surety to Rice Creek Watershed District <br />as part of their permit, City Staff is agreeable to lowering the financial guarantee to $5,000. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Discuss amending the financial guarantee amounts in the Developer’s Agreement with Mr. <br />Harstad. If the City Council agrees to amend the financial guarantee amounts, a “Motion to <br />Amend” can be made rather than acting on a resolution. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted By, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Heidi Heller <br />Planning Associate <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Developer’s Agreement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.