My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2014/11/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
Agenda Packets - 2014/11/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:14 PM
Creation date
6/20/2018 2:59:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/24/2014
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/24/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Res. 8329 Approving Non-Standard Street Design and Parking Restrictions for Groveland Road in Area H <br />Page 3 <br />$125,000 in life cycle costs ($80,000 in initial costs) and decreases stormwater management <br />requirements by four to six infiltration basins. Bump-out parking is proposed on Ardan Avenue <br />next to the Groveland Park shelter and can serve as additional parking for baseball games. <br /> <br />Speeding <br />The predominant complaint to the City by residents adjacent to this section of Groveland Road <br />have is speeding traffic. Motorists will typically drive at a speed that they feel comfortable to <br />adequately react to a situation which requires them to slow down, stop, or change course. A <br />typical situation is a basketball that rolls into the street from an adjacent driveway or a vehicle <br />pulling out of the driveway. A street that is wide with no adjacent obstacles will encourage higher <br />speeds, while a narrow street or traffic lanes with obstacles adjacent to the lane (e.g. parked cars, <br />barrier curbs, etc.) will encourage responsible motorists to slow down. <br /> <br />Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations <br />A sidewalk on the east side of Groveland Road would also serve the local properties to gain <br />access to the future trail segment 6 on County Road 10. Pedestrian and bicycle usage may <br />increase on Groveland Road if the multi-use trail (segment 6) is constructed in the north boulevard <br />of County Road 10 – which will provide service to the trail network. Given Groveland’s intersection <br />with County Road 10 is in close proximity to the County Road 10’s intersection with Hillview Road <br />(a west-east corridor) and to the protected traffic signalized County Road 10/Red Oak Drive/Silver <br />Lake Road, close easy access to the east (Hillview) or south (Silver Lake Road) provides a good <br />benefit to cost. Long Lake Road may serve as a connection to the east at the north end of <br />Groveland. <br /> <br />The sidewalk on the east side would also provide good access to Groveland Park. A single <br />parking lane on the west side of the roadway could also be used as a shared-use lane for <br />pedestrians and bicyclists. A 5.5-foot bike lane would cost approximately $75,000 in life cycle <br />costs ($45,000 in initial costs). Constructing a 6-foot sidewalk would cost approximately $80,000 <br />but it’s life cycle cost would only be approximately $100,000. <br /> <br />Public Feedback <br />A public information meeting was conducted on October 20, 2014 where adjacent properties <br />owners were invited to a presentation and provide public input. Most of those who attended and <br />spoke were not in favor of a sidewalk or elimination of a parking lane. Another feedback form <br />showing an option with two parking lanes was mailed and reviewed at the November 24, 2014 <br />Street and Utility Committee meeting. Of the 71 properties that were sent the mailing, 31 <br />responded (44%) – 15 north of Ardan and 16 south. A summary of the response is shown on the <br />attached feedback form. In general, adjacent properties prefer Option C with parking lanes on <br />both sides of the street – most similar to existing conditions. Option B with a single parking lane <br />and a combined sidewalk/bike lane was second most popular, and Option A with a single parking <br />lane and sidewalk was least popular with those that responded. Since only 44% of the properties <br />responded, there is no popular consent for any option. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Engineering Recommendation <br />Engineering staff recommends a 32-foot wide street section with two 11-foot travel lanes, a single <br />8-foot parking lane adjacent to the southbound travel lane (west side) for Groveland Road (Option <br />A). A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk is also recommended on the east side immediately behind the <br />curb for the entire length. The parking lane on the west can serve as a shared-use lane due to the <br />low parking utilization and low traffic volumes. The 2-foot reaction zone is adequate for bike traffic <br />heading north due to the low traffic volumes allowing passing vehicles to encroach into the <br />southbound lane. This recommendation is based upon engineering judgment related to benefit-to- <br />cost ratio of constructing an additional parking lane, reducing speed, and consistent design with <br />other municipal streets.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.