My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2013/11/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agenda Packets - 2013/11/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:15 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 8:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/25/2013
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Heidi Weller <br />From: Dan Fish <radiocty@skypoint.com> <br />Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 5:23 PM <br />To: Heidi Heller <br />Subject: Re: Proposed City Code amendment for ground signs <br />Heidi, <br />With all due respects: <br />The sign is a way for traffic at a distance to locate a business. Locals know where you are --no need for a sign for them <br />unless they are new residents. The height of a sign less looking over the top of a car next to you; is the square root of 2 <br />times the sign height.. a 30 foot sign is visible from 7 miles less the topography. Yes, the writing is not readable at that <br />distance. <br />If a sign ordnance keeps folks from locating you --There is no sense being in that City-- If the cost of building a sign is to <br />expensive, that is another problem. I propose that the best sign then is one seen on a Web site --Every one in the world <br />can see it, is cost nothing to maintain, you can be outside the tax structure of a city so rent goes down and taxes are <br />less, you are outside the codes of a city, no fire codes and no contribution to the city. That is where this all is leading. <br />Buy from Amazon in another state and city. <br />Dan Fish <br />On 11/18/2013 4:43 PM, Heidi Heller wrote: <br />Dear Mounds View Business Community, <br />One of the Mounds View City Council's priorities for 2013 is the County Road 10 corridor. They <br />asked the Planning Commission to work on changes to the City Code to help promote <br />development and improve the aesthetics of the Corridor. One of the changes that the Planning <br />Commission came up with is to change the requirements for ground signs. Since this change <br />would most affect the businesses, we wanted to let you know about what is being reviewed and <br />give you a chance to offer comments. The trend for new grounds signs has been monument <br />style signs that are lower to the ground. The Commission felt that ground signs are much easier <br />to see when they are closer to the ground versus being elevated 30 feet in the air, and that the <br />sign base should include some masonry and not just be a pole. <br />There is currently an ordinance before the City Council that would change a few requirements <br />for ground signs. The proposed changes would lower the allowed height limits of grounds signs <br />to 16 feet, but they could be placed closer to County Road 10. Other changes would be to <br />require the signs to include masonry materials (brick, stone, etc.). The allowed amount of <br />square footage for signs would not change. This change to the City Code would NOT require <br />that existing signs be replaced. Ground signs that currently exist may remain, and can be <br />maintained and repaired, and the graphics panels can be replaced. IF the sign were damaged <br />beyond 50% of its value, or if the sign was remodeled beyond just replacing sign panels, or if it <br />was going to be moved, THEN it would need to comply with the updated City Code. <br />I can send anyone a full copy of the ordinance (Ordinance 884). The City Council will hold a <br />public hearing about this ordinance on Monday, November 25, 2013 at 7pm, and will take final <br />action on Monday, December 9, 2013. Please let me know if you have any questions or <br />comments. 1 can pass your comments on to the City Council if you cannot attend a meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.