Laserfiche WebLink
Regulatory Options for E -Cigarettes / 3 <br />While legal challenges to such policies can be anticipated in light of the e -cigarette <br />industry's investment in price -related marketing strategies, a federal district court has <br />recently upheld a local law prohibiting the sale of discounted tobacco products. 16 In <br />early 2012, Providence, Rhode Island enacted an ordinance prohibiting licensed tobacco <br />dealers from selling discounted tobacco products through coupon redemption and multi- <br />pack offers." Tobacco industry stakeholders challenged the law on First Amendment <br />and federal and state preemption grounds. In December 2012, a federal district court <br />upheld the pricing ordinance, concluding that its prohibition against certain industry price <br />discounting practices did not violate the First Amendment, and also was not preempted <br />by federal or state law. 18 <br />Although this decision has been appealed, and even if upheld, would not be controlling in <br />all jurisdictions, Providence's promising early results may help support similar state or <br />local laws to prohibit the deeply discounted sale of emerging tobacco products like e - <br />cigarettes. <br />Free Samples <br />Regulatory Gap: Under the Tobacco Control Act, tobacco manufacturers are restricted <br />from distributing free samples of "cigarettes, smokeless tobacco or other tobacco <br />products." 19 At present, this restriction does not apply to e -cigarettes. Although the FDA <br />has indicated that it intends to regulate electronic cigarettes as tobacco products, the <br />agency has yet to issue regulations asserting jurisdiction over e -cigarettes or extending <br />the Act's prohibition on free samples to electronic cigarettes. 20 <br />• Regulatory Options: State and local governments could prohibit the distribution of all <br />free sarnp2les of tobacco products, including e -cigarettes and other nicotine delivery <br />systems. I <br />Flavoring <br />Regulatory Gap: Another disparity exists in the way flavored e -cigarette cartridges are <br />regulated versus flavored cigarettes. Under the Tobacco Control Act, tobacco companies <br />are prohibited from producing cigarettes containing any characterizing flavor other than <br />tobacco or menthol.22 This prohibition is limited to flavored cigarettes, however. E - <br />cigarette manufacturers can continue to market e -cigarette cartridges in a variety of <br />candy -like flavors that appeal to youth (such as bubble gum, chocolate, and mint),23 and <br />sell them at mall kiosks, where young people often congregate, as well as online, where <br />safeguards against youth access can be breached more easily than in face-to-face <br />purchases. <br />• Regulatory Options: Although the Tobacco Control Act prohibits state and local <br />governments from establishing tobacco product standards relating to the manufacture of <br />tobacco products, it expressly preserves the authority of state and local governments to <br />regulate the sale and distribution of tobacco products. 24 <br />Tobacco Control Legal Consortium 875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 551053076 wvm.publichealthlawcentecorg 651.290.7506 <br />