My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2013/11/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agenda Packets - 2013/11/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:54 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 8:06:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/4/2013
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/4/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regulatory Options for E -Cigarettes / 8 <br />3121 C.F.R. § 1140.14(a). <br />32 Freiberg, supra note 9, at 434. <br />" See Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, Regulating E -Cigarettes — Tips and Tools (2011) (including <br />select U.S. legislation and policies regulating e -cigarettes), available at <br />http-//nublichealthlawcenter ore/sites/default/files/resources/tcic-guide-reeecias-201 Lodf; Tobacco <br />Control Legal Consortium, Raising the Minimune Legal Sale Age for Tobacco and Related Products <br />(2012), available at http://publichealthlaweenter ort/sites/default/files/resources/tcic-guide- <br />minimumlegal-saleage-2012 0.12df. <br />34 See, e.g., Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, Model Ordinance Prohibiting Sneaking in All Workplaces <br />and Public Places 7 (2011), available at http7//www.no-smoke.org/pdf/inodelordinance.pdf. <br />" 15 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq. <br />36 See 23-34 9401 St. Grocery Corp. v. New York City Bd. of Health, 685 F.3d 174,193-85 (2d Cir. 2012) <br />(affirming a district court decision ruling that New York City may not require cigarette retailers to post <br />graphic health warnings next to cash registers or adjacent to cigarette displays, on the grounds that the <br />Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act prevents state or local governments from adopting laws <br />that affect the content of tobacco retailers' and manufacturers' promotional efforts). The challenged <br />warning signs depicted the health impacts of smoking and contained the message "quit smoking today." <br />It should be noted that if a jurisdiction adopted graphic point-of-sale warning requirements applying to <br />non -cigarette tobacco products such as electronic cigarettes, the FCLAA would not apply. However, the <br />law would almost certainly be challenged on First Amendment grounds. <br />" Freiberg, supra note 9, at 438. <br />38 For additional information, see the Tobacco Control Legal Consortium's publications on First <br />Amendment and Commerce Clause issues in the regulation of tobacco products, available at <br />hM,//nublichealthlawcenter ore/tonics/special-collections/federal-regulation-tobacco-collection. <br />Tobacco Control Legal Consortium 875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105-3076 wwnv.publicbealtblawcenler.org 651.290.7506 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.