My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:25 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 8:08:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/7/2013
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/7/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
14. In Section XVII, Cities are allowed to make a full payment on equipment it was previously making payments on. I'm <br />not sure what the 30 -day deadline refers to, however. Does this mean that if we make a payment, then decide to <br />allocate unexpended levy dollars toward making full payment of the equipment, we cannot do so if more than 30 days <br />have elapsed since the last installment payment? <br />A: That section, which was from the 2001 JPA, was removed in the revised JPA. <br />15. The agreement in Section XX references the task force and the planning for a successor voting system. Seems <br />unsettling to talk about replacing a system that has not yet been ordered. How many years are we thinking the new <br />system will serve us? <br />A: This will be our third generation of optical scan voting systems. The first voting system was used for 14 years. Our <br />currently system is in its 13th year of use. Hence, the proposed JPA would be for 14 years. The new system has been in <br />the planning stage for the past three years. <br />16. Related to my 4th comment above, it would seem that there is some overlap with regard to implementation <br />services, annual maintenance and the cost summary expressed in Appendices B, C & D and the agreement already in <br />place for the County to provide election services to the City. Will there be a cost reduction in either agreement? <br />A: The JPA only covers the voting system operations. The election contract covers the administration of elections. The <br />only overlap is the new part of the proposed JPA that governs the operation of the absentee ballot counting center. <br />Currently, the costs of the election judges for the counting center are covered in the election contract. These costs will <br />be transferred to the joint powers agreement. I will have a better idea of the amount to be transferred once I know <br />which voting system we will be acquiring, but in any case, it's will not likely be a huge amount. <br />That's all for now, we look forward to your response. <br />Jim Ericson <br />City Administrator <br />City of Mounds View <br />2401 County Road 10 <br />Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />763-717-4001 (Phone) <br />763-717-4019(Fax) <br />763-464-9644 (Cell) <br />www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us (Web) <br />From: Mansky, Joseph[mailto:Joseph.Manslcy@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US] <br />Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 2:25 PM <br />To: Sue Iverson; Amy Dietl; Blaine; Michelle Tesser; Bart Fischer; Jessica Jagoe; Heather Butkowski; Kathy Glanzer; <br />Maplewood; Maplewood; Maplewood; Moore, Shari; Desaree Crane; New Brighton; Stephanie Marty; Bette Malm; <br />Carolyn Curti; Barb Suciu; Shoreview; Spring Lake Park; Spring Lake Park; Kathy Keefe; White Bear Lake; White Bear Lal<e, <br />Judy Moll <br />Subject: draft joint powers agreement for city review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.