My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-2013 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
08-12-2013 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:01:10 AM
Creation date
6/26/2018 9:12:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL 1 <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2 <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3 <br /> 4 <br />Regular Meeting 5 <br />June 24, 2013 6 <br />Mounds View City Hall 7 <br />2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 8 <br />7:00 P.M. 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br />1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 12 <br /> 13 <br />2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 14 <br /> 15 <br />3. ROLL CALL: Flaherty, Gunn, Hull, Meehlhause, Mueller 16 <br /> 17 <br /> NOT PRESENT: None. 18 <br /> 19 <br />4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 20 <br /> A. Monday, June 24, 2013, City Council Agenda. 21 <br /> 22 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Meehlhause. To Approve the Monday, June 24, 2013, agenda as 23 <br />presented. 24 <br /> 25 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 26 <br /> 27 <br />5. PUBLIC INPUT 28 <br /> 29 <br />Bill Kowalik, 7220 Hidden Hollow Court, questioned why the City was placing barriers in his 30 <br />backyard. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Public Works Director DeBar explained the barriers were being put in place to stop people from 33 <br />using the path. The home that abuts H2 has a driveway and the City has been allowed to use this 34 <br />pathway as an access for sewer cleanouts. However, this did not mean all of the homeowners 35 <br />would have the same access. He commented the property was public and was not meant for 36 <br />private property to use this as an access point. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mr. Kowalik requested that one end of the path be closed but not both. He understood that the 39 <br />property owner at Pleasant View Drive has complained about the traffic on his end. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned where the gates would be located. Public Works Director 42 <br />DeBar reviewed the proposed location of the two gates. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.