Agenda Packets - 2012/01/09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council December 12, 2011 Regular Meeting Page 6 presented the Council with pictures taken by the Mound View Police Department. 1 2 Mayor Flaherty indicated the City had no recourse but to go after the property owner to ensure 3 that site would be cleaned. Ms. Morse stated the site was clean and the list received from the 4 City was reviewed. 5 6 Mike Morse explained a trespassing notice has been posted on the site to ensure no further items 7 were stored or left on the site. He questioned when he could sell the items left on site. City 8 Attorney Riggs indicated abandoned items left on the site could be removed or sold by the 9 property owner after proper notification has been made. He recommended a reputable company 10 be used for the abatement to ensure that items were held for the property timeline. 11 12 Mayor Flaherty recommended the property owners continue to work with City staff to ensure that 13 all items were taken care of. 14 15 MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7864, 16 Authorizing the Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 8379 Red Oak Drive. 17 18 Council Member Gunn indicated the Council was going through the formality of the process to 19 place the abatement on the record. She thanked the property owner for working with the City on 20 this issue. 21 22 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 23 24 E. Resolution 7865, Approving the Minor Subdivision of a Vacant Parcel 25 adjacent to 2565 & 2573 Sherwood Road. 26 27 Planning Associate Heller explained the Council was being requested to approve a minor 28 subdivision of a vacant parcel adjacent to 2565 and 2573 Sherwood Road. She reviewed the 29 location and noted Parcel A would be subdivided and sold to neighbor Joe Holl at 2573 30 Sherwood Road. 31 32 Planning Associate Heller indicated the city is requiring that the parcels would have to be tax 33 combined in order to allow for an accessory structure to be built on the additional property. She 34 explained Parcel B was landlocked, while Parcel A has platted road frontage and could possibly 35 have access to unimproved Greenwood Drive, which made it a potentially buildable lot. If either 36 of the lots were developed in the future, park dedications fees would need to be paid to the City. 37 She stated the Planning Commission recommended approval. 38 39 Mayor Flaherty requested further information on how an accessory structure could be built. 40 Planning Associate Heller stated if the parcels were tax combined an accessory structure would 41 be allowed. If the parcels were separated, the lot would have one year to be developed, or the 42 accessory structure would have to be removed. 43 44 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7865, 45