Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item 07B <br />PH – Solicitor License Appeal <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />e. A conviction within the past five (5) years of the date of application for <br />any violation of any federal or state statute or regulation, or of any local <br />ordinance, which adversely reflects upon the person’s ability to conduct <br />the business for which the permit is being sought in a professional, <br />honest and legal manner. Such violations shall include, but are not <br />limited to, burglary, theft, larceny, swindling, fraud, unlawful business <br />practices, and any form of actual or threatened physical harm against <br />another person. (Added, Ord. 834, 10-10-09) <br /> <br />Mr. Hill’s convictions are dated in 2009, and both convictions are about one (1) month apart. <br />According to the BCA’s Minnesota Public Criminal History, Mr. Hill damaged property <br />(conviction: March 19, 2009), and gave police officers fraudulent information by giving a <br />false name (conviction: April 20, 2009). The Police Chief denied the solicitor license <br />application under the grounds that the presence of these convictions during the past five (5) <br />years is considered a disqualification for a solicitor license under City Code §504.04(e). <br />Attached is Mr. Hill’s Minnesota Public Criminal History for your reference. This attached <br />criminal history is considered public data. <br /> <br />Mr. Hill submitted a letter to the City explaining his actions in 2009. In his letter, he regrets his <br />past actions. Attached is Mr. Hill’s letter for your reference. <br /> <br />Mr. Hill’s manager, Tony Strouth of Window Concepts of Minnesota, spoke to the Police <br />Chief, and asked the Police Chief to reconsider his decision. Mr. Strouth stated to the Police <br />Chief that Windows Concepts of Minnesota has a Certificate of Liability Insurance (attached) <br />that protects property owners of employee dishonesty at $5,000 per crime. Although this <br />insurance may be a great protection for the residents of Mounds View, Staff felt that the <br />combination of the convictions within five (5) years, and the conviction of giving Police Officers <br />a false name would continue to be a disqualification under the City Code, regardless of the <br />insurance certificate. <br /> <br />Staff contacted Mr. Strouth of Mr. Hill’s rights under the City Code to appeal the decision of <br />Mr. Hill’s solicitor license. Under §504.11, of the City Code: <br /> <br />504.11: APPEALS: Any person aggrieved by the action of the Chief of <br />Police or the City Administrator in the denial, revocation, or suspension <br />of a permit as provided in Sections 504.05 and 504.07 of this Chapter <br />may appeal to the Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with <br />the Council within fourteen (14) days after notice of the action <br />complained of by a written statement setting forth fully the grounds for <br />the appeal. The Council shall set a time and place for a hearing on <br />such appeal within twenty (20) days, and notice of such hearing shall <br />be given to the appellant in the same manner as provided in Section <br />504.07 of this Chapter for notice of hearing on revocation. (1988 Code <br />§110.13) (Amended, Ord. 834, 10-10-09; Ord. 844, 5-20-10) <br /> <br />