My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2012/05/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agenda Packets - 2012/05/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:00 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 2:51:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/14/2012
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 26, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Council Member Hull questioned how many times the Downing permit was extended. City 1 <br />Administrator Ericson noted the permit was extended on several occasions before construction 2 <br />began. He stated it was immaterial that the permit was extended as it was reasonable for him to 3 <br />build the garage to the standards in place at the time the permit was issued. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if the permit could be extended every six months as long as progress 6 <br />was being made. City Administrator Ericson indicated this was true with buildings under 7 <br />construction. This differed from extending the actual permit when no construction had yet 8 <br />occurred. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Flaherty recalled the Council had allowed for the garage to remain at the 2007 building 11 <br />standards, which meant the garage would require a nine inch variance. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Stigney stated the variance was denied based on the Planning Commission’s 14 <br />recommendation given the information provided. Based on the new information he felt the issue 15 <br />should go back to the Planning Commission for consideration. 16 <br /> 17 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated if this was the case, the City would have to back off the 18 <br />resolution of denial and request the Planning Commission to reconsider the variance with the 19 <br />new information. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated this was the case, and the Council would need to take a step back 22 <br />from the original variance denial. The Council would need to rescind the previous approval and 23 <br />take action on the issue. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked how the Council was to proceed. 26 <br /> 27 <br />City Attorney Riggs recommended the Council properly notify the public of the issue for a 28 <br />decision at the next Planning Commission meeting. He indicated the Council would need to 29 <br />rescind the present Resolution. 30 <br /> 31 <br />City Administrator Ericson noted the Council should move to rescind a Resolution and direct the 32 <br />variance request to the Planning Commission. 33 <br /> 34 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Rescind Resolution 7903, Directing Staff to bring the 35 <br />Tim Downing Variance Request back to the Planning Commission, with proper public 36 <br />notification for consideration with the new information. 37 <br /> 38 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Mueller) Motion carried. 39 <br /> 40 <br />C. Reports of City Attorney. 41 <br /> 42 <br />City Attorney Riggs had nothing additional to report. 43 <br /> 44 <br />12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, April 2, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.