Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 7K <br />Meeting Date: May 14, 2012 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />Administrator Review: ________ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 872, Amending <br />Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View City Code Pertaining to Dynamic <br />Display Signs <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />The City amended its sign code on January 12, 2009 to include operational requirements and <br />conditions for the use of dynamic display signage with the adoption of Ordinance 816. The code has <br />since been amended to make additional changes after the dynamic sign code was put into effect. Staff <br />is proposing another amendment. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Prior to the adoption of the ordinance regulating dynamic signs in 2009, these types of signs were not <br />specifically addressed in the City Code, and were allowed just as other types of signs. With the new <br />technology that was allowing dynamic displays to become more affordable and common for <br />businesses, and the conversion of billboards to electronic signs, the City Council felt they needed to put <br />some regulations on these types of signs. The sign code was amended to add a section specifically for <br />dynamic signs. <br /> <br />A local business would like to install a dynamic sign on their building as a wall sign. City Staff reviewed <br />the sign code and it states that “dynamic display signs are allowed on on-site free standing or ground <br />signs.” The City Council discussed this issue at their April 9, 2012 meeting and decided that when the <br />new dynamic display language was added to the City Code, there was no intention of specifically not <br />allowing dynamic displays as wall signs. The City Council asked that the Planning Commission discuss <br />amending the Code to remove the language stating what type of signs that dynamic displays can be <br />located on. On April 18, 2012, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed amendments and <br />unanimously approved Resolution 960-12. The City Council discussed this amendment at the May 7, <br />2012 Worksession, and were agreeable to moving forward with the proposed language. <br /> <br />The City Council asked whether other cities allow dynamic display signs as wall signs. New Brighton, <br />Fridley and White Bear Lake do not prohibit dynamic display wall signs in commercial zoning districts. <br />Fridley and White Bear Lake also require a Special Use Permit for all dynamic display signs. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />The City Council should review Ordinance 872 with the proposed City Code amendment and take <br />testimony from staff. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> Heidi Heller <br />Planning Associate <br /> <br />Attachment: <br />1. Ordinance 872