Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Area E Curb Cut Appeals <br />Page 2 <br />June 11, 2012 <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Resolution 7338 outlines the conditions and standards where the City will allow multiple <br />accesses to single-family property. The resolution states that all of the conditions must be met. <br />In this case, conditions 1a and 1b are not met. <br /> <br />1a. The access beyond the primary access existed prior to January 2000, or has been <br />permitted by the City through an approved variance or other acceptable means. <br /> <br />The area for the requested second curb cut is not currently a true curb cut at the street, <br />and has not existed prior to January 2000. Nor has any type of City approval been given <br />for a second curb cut to exist on your property. <br /> <br />1b. The access in question has an improved surface in compliance with City Code <br />requirements. <br /> <br />There is no improved surface (asphalt, concrete or pavers) at the street indicating that a <br />curb cut exists. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />The City Council should consider testimony from staff, the property owners, residents or any <br />other affected person or interested party. The City Council will need to determine whether it <br />believes sufficient reasons exist to allow the property owners to install a second curb cut onto <br />Woodcrest Drive. Allowing a second curb cut would not be consistent with the standards and <br />conditions set in the City Code and those in Resolution 7338. Staff has prepared a resolution <br />of denial for the Council to take action on if they so choose. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> Heidi Heller <br />Planning Associate <br /> <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Resolution 7338, Adopted September 22, 2008 <br />2. Photos of 5101 Brighton Lane <br />3. Narrative from property owners <br />4. Resolution 7957 <br />