Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 07A <br />Meeting Date: Sept 24, 2012 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Request Submitted by Kathleen Smith for the <br />Removal of Planning Commissioner Gary Rundle <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />Kathleen Smith, resident on Spring Lake Road, submitted a formal request to the City <br />dated September 5, 2012 (Received September 10, 2012) for the City Council to <br />consider removing Gary Rundle from the Planning Commission immediately along with <br />barring him from serving in any capacity for any city representative position, volunteer <br />or otherwise. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />According to a police report filed on July 11, 2012, Ms. Smith alleges that Mr. Rundle <br />had been engaging in an ongoing and continual pattern of harassment against Ms. <br />Smith by throwing litter in her yard. Armed with video surveillance evidence which <br />clearly showed Mr. Rundle tossing beverage containers in her yard in early morning <br />hours, Ms. Smith brought her concerns to the Mounds View Police Department. As a <br />result, Mr. Rundle was charged with littering and last month pled guilty and was fined <br />accordingly. The police report is attached for the Council’s reference. <br /> <br />Removing a commissioner from office, as Ms. Smith is requesting, has to follow certain <br />procedures as articulated in City Code. Determining whether Mr. Rundle’s actions <br />constitute just cause is left to the discretion of the City Council. Section 401.03 of the <br />City Code indicates, “An appointed member of the Commission may be removed from <br />office for just cause and on written charges by at least four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire <br />City Council, but such member shall be entitled to a public hearing before such vote is <br />taken.” <br /> <br />The City Attorney has provided an opinion concerning this matter, speaking to the issue <br />of just cause: “The cause must be one which specifically relates to and affects the <br />administration of the office, and must be restricted to something of a substantial nature <br />directly affecting the rights and interests of the public. The cause must be one touching <br />the qualifications of the official or the official's performance of the official's duties, <br />showing that the official is not a fit or proper person to hold office.” <br /> <br />In addition to the above, courts have stated "just cause" means any act of commission <br />or omission that, considered to be in relation to the duty involved, would stamp the <br />person in question as unfit to occupy the position - one whose conduct became <br />inimicable to the public welfare. <br /> <br /> <br />