Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 24, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />Barb Stasz, 8357 Eastwood Road, commented she was surprised by the recent newspaper article. 1 <br />She found it sad that a Planning Commissioner would act in this manner. She questioned his 2 <br />overall character or lack thereof. Ms. Stasz stated Ms. Smith was simply standing up for herself 3 <br />and the harassment that was she was being subjected to. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked the Council for comments or questions. 6 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if the Rundle’s cats had collars. Ms. Rundle noted that one cat 7 <br />had a collar. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Mueller encouraged the Rundles to place collars on each of their cats. She then 10 <br />inquired if the cat in Ms. Smith’s shed had a collar. Ms. Smith commented the cat in her shed 11 <br />did not have a collar. She clarified also that it was not just one or two cans that were thrown in 12 <br />her yard. The police department has nine in evidence at this time. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned what color the cat was that Ms. Smith found in her shed. Ms. Smith 15 <br />stated the cat was gray. Ms. Rundle indicated her nine year old cat was grey and white. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Flaherty requested further information on how Ms. Smith captured the video images of 18 <br />Mr. Rundle. Ms. Smith explained the process she used with her video camera noting she 19 <br />videotaped his van leaving his driveway, littering and pulling away on two occasions. However, 20 <br />the event took place on more than two occasions, which led her to begin collecting the cans. Ms. 21 <br />Smith indicated at the time of these events, she was recovering from major back surgery and was 22 <br />receiving help from friends. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated the cans were not being disputed by Mr. Rundle. He indicated Ms. Smith 25 <br />had suspected the cans were coming from Mr. Rundle. Ms. Smith stated this was the case. She 26 <br />commented the seriousness of this behavior was not just littering, it was harassment. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the Council can only deal with the facts at this time, as it has become a 29 <br />“he said, she said” case. He requested the City Administrator review City Code on how a 30 <br />Commission member can be removed from their seat. City Administrator Ericson reviewed City 31 <br />Code Section 401.03, stating just cause was necessary along with a 4/5ths vote from the Council. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mayor Flaherty requested further information from staff on “just cause.” City Attorney Riggs 34 <br />explained “just cause” to be the cause which specifically relates to and effects the administration 35 <br />of the office the member holds and must be restricted to something of a substantial nature 36 <br />directly affecting the rights and interests of the public. The cause must be one touching the 37 <br />qualifications of the official, the official’s performance of the officials duties, showing the 38 <br />official is not a fit or proper person to hold office. He stated this was a high standard, and not 39 <br />just the whim of the Council. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if the Council would like to move forward with a formal hearing for 42 <br />this matter. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Mueller stated she has been known to make mistakes, even willful mistakes. 45