Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 28, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney recommended the memorandum of understanding also be put on hold. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Flaherty did not understand the need for the stipend and felt the officer’s knowledge and 3 <br />experience should be passed along to new officers as part of the job description as a Sergeant. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Hull questioned how the training was completed in the past. City 6 <br />Administrator Ericson stated in the past, an additional stipend was offered to field training 7 <br />officers, but they were Police Officers and not Sergeants. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if training was included within the Sergeant’s job description. 10 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated he reviewed the job description and it did not list training for 11 <br />junior officers as one of its directives. However, this was up to interpretation and there was an 12 <br />item that stated, “all other duties as assigned.” 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Flaherty understood a stipend should be paid to field training officers but did not 15 <br />understand the need for an additional stipend to those promoted to a higher position within the 16 <br />department. He recommended the item be placed on hold with the contract. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Hull indicated the field training could be over and above the regular training 19 <br />conducted by Sergeants. For this reason, he would support the item as presented. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned if the Sergeants were certified to complete the field training. 22 <br />City Administrator Ericson was uncertain if certification was necessary. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Gunn felt the stipend should be paid to the officers that are certified to 25 <br />complete the field training within the department whether a patrol officer or a Sergeant. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Council Member Mueller commented that in the past, Sergeants completed the training of new 28 <br />officers. However, as of late, Patrol Officers have completed this task, providing them additional 29 <br />income and experience for future promotions. She felt the issue should be put on hold until the 30 <br />LELS contract was decided. 31 <br /> 32 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Hull. To Postpone Resolution 7756, the Memorandum of 33 <br />Understanding between the City and LELS 232 about a Training Stipend, until further 34 <br />information was available from the Legislature. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Hull indicated the recent officers hired would need to be trained. He did not 37 <br />want to see this training hindered based on Council action taken this evening. Finance Director 38 <br />Beer stated the training would be completed by the Police Department regardless. However, he 39 <br />cautioned the Council on this issue stating additional duties would have to be assumed by the 40 <br />officers and the Council may have to consider additional compensation. Because of this, 41 <br />precedence could be set for all workers within the City any time additional duties are added to a 42 <br />job description. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Gunn explained this could create a problem if the Sergeants were asked to go 45